AKTAY: Why are Arab countries silent about the ethnic cleansing of Arabs in Syria?



[ad_1]

Quit press

Yassin Aktay, an advisor to the ruling AKP party president in Turkey, criticized the silence of Arab countries over the policy of ethnic cleansing against Arabs in Syria, including the United States.

The Turkish newspaper "Yeni فق afak" published an article by Aktay entitled "Does the Arab League Have an Arab Policy?"

The agreement between the United States and Turkey on the creation of a permanent corridor for peace in northern Syria should contribute mainly to ensuring a safe space for the Syrian people.

Securing this area will in turn provide the Syrian people with security coverage against the Assad massacres, which does not distinguish between a civilian and an army. A secure space will also ensure that terrorist organizations will not move or be threatened.

The current situation is that BYD, which is supported and dominated by the United States, carries out an ethnic cleansing of the Arabs and politically to Kurds who are not subject to their moods.

In fact, Arabs in the region (northern Syria) are the first victims of this ethnic cleansing. We have already asked a question and we can ask it again in another form.

We have already asked the following question: does the Arab League have an immigration policy towards the majority of Arab immigrants who have had to emigrate from Syria, Libya, Iraq? , Yemen, etc.?

Today, we repeat the same question with a step forward:

Does the Arab League worry about Arab peoples being ethnically cleansed, especially in Iraq and Syria, and does it have a policy based on this concern?

The PYD, which takes power and tyranny in the United States, seeks to establish an ethnic state in Syria, in areas where 90% of the population is Arab.

To avoid any misunderstanding, this state is not a Kurdish state or something of the kind. It is a country far removed from Islam, customs and humanity, from Kurdistan, from the experience of the PKK, which is trying to create an ethnic state under the name of a Kurdish language that has nothing to do with it. to see with Kurdish, under a false Kurdish culture and which at the same time moves them. The one who opposes it.

Of course, there are those who passionately welcome these practices under the name of "Kurdish State". Above all, there is no trace of Kurdish for those who welcome their passionate emotions under the Kurdish name, with such a troop-filled training, through which the United States seeks to occupy the peoples of the region .

There can be no greater Kurdish fusion than this betrayal. There was no trace of Kurdish for those who received this with pleasure and gratitude.

But this is not our original theme. The main problem is that there are no objections or voices from the Arab countries, especially from the Arab League, which groups them under the veil of Arab values, nor from the Arab League. Objection or voice to what is happening in the demographic process of which the victims are mainly Arabs one way or another.

We believe that Arab countries have recently opened the door to secularism. Until now, however, it is no longer hidden or secret than political options, motivated by secularism, to the last degree, under the guise of a religious image. This means that these countries have not become new laymen, but have begun to adapt only to new apparent tastes.

In other words, the only difference is that they no longer feel the need to adopt a religious image and the legitimacy it contains. Now they no longer have a problem called Jerusalem, or a problem called Palestine, they are no longer concerned about what oppressed Muslims around the world are going through.

We will turn a blind eye to Islam, but is there any concern or responsibility arising from the need for Arabism? Millions of Arabs in Syria are now deported only because they are Arab and left to ethnic cleansing.

There is no effort, step or step to prevent them from being persecuted and oppressed. These countries, which have very good relations with the United States, contribute effectively to the US economy and provide jobs for hundreds of thousands of US citizens. Should not they oppose US policy in Syria based on ethnic cleansing of Arabs?

As a result of this ethnic cleansing, millions of Syrians have been forced to leave their country, mostly migrants, for non-Arab countries. Can not the Arab League put this issue on its main agenda?

If the Arab League is indifferent to putting this issue on its agenda or if it does not wish to take action in this regard, why has the Arab League been created and in which what purpose then?

I am sure that some of these questions were received naively, but I sincerely ask that any existing institution created for any purpose, I think it is incumbent on it to do something for which it has become a name, and in fact she can do it. .

If the Arab League already implements its name, I hope that these issues will be taken into account: following the migration of the citizens of the "third" Arab countries because of the conflicts on their lands, following the crises of the Arab countries themselves, the citizens of countries like Syria, Yemen, Libya, Egypt and Iraq leave their homes, the question of how many of these migrants were hosted by the Arab countries, what was the same reason for the migration of these citizens ?.

Why did these immigrants fled their country of origin to Turkey and European countries without going to any Arab country? When can Arab countries live for their peoples and think of providing them with an honest and safe life?

Why should non-Arab states think of the dignity of Arab peoples rather than their leaders?

Would not the Arab rulers themselves have given the green light and the right to non-Arab countries to intervene in the Arab territories?

On this occasion, let us remember what we repeat several times to misunderstand anyone: Turkey is home to more Arabs than the soul of several Arab countries. Therefore, his right to speak on behalf of the Arab people is natural for that reason.

[ad_2]
Source link