[ad_1]
A government employee ordered a woman employing a woman to live with him and his friends for one night to stop treatment, but the woman informed the authorities and was arrested in flagrante delicto.
In detail, the woman was surprised that a government employee had promised to terminate her treatment in exchange for an evening that he had prepared, including schnapps, hashish, girls and young people, so the woman decided to inform the CPVPV.
The Commission for the Promotion of Virtue in Mecca coordinated with the woman to let him know what he wanted and has already communicated with her and explained to her that he wished that she would come spend the night in one of the apartments.
The woman again contacted the Commission and told her what had happened to her. She then contacted the Commission by telephone and arranged for her to meet in the apartment behind the restaurant at noon.
Members of the Commission visited the site mentioned for investigation and verification, and when the woman arrived at the door of the building, she was waiting for the employee, picking her up and going up to the fourth floor.
Commission members, the employee and the woman, continued to find the door of the apartment open and the man heading inland. He was therefore arrested in flagrante delicto, to show that he had several relationships with girls who had exploited him because of his work.
Separate documents were sorted in the letter from the investigation department on employment-related offenses, which was processed and referred to the criminal court, and then the employee was charged with the offense. having exploited his professional influence outside the department, when he evoked the woman according to a number of pieces of evidence such as voice recording, letters from her phone and her own confessions.
The court sentenced the defendant to one year 's imprisonment as of the date of his arrest pending the case and a fine of 1,000 riyals. The verdict was confirmed by the Court of Appeal.
It should be noted that the crimes of exploitation of power were prescribed by the Kingdom's regime of specific penalties, namely a maximum imprisonment of 10 years and a minimum of 24 hours, and a fine from 1 minimum riyals and one million riyals maximum for the offense.
The legal service explained Echo "The judgment mentioned in the Code of Criminal Provisions and Principles of the Office of the Ombudsman identifies corruption offenses as defined in Article V, which states:
Any public official who has asked, for himself or for others, or has accepted or given a promise or a gift, to exert a real or alleged influence to obtain or attempt to obtain from any public authority a any work, order, decision, obligation, license, supply contract, job, service or benefit. Are considered as corruption and punished with the penalty provided for in Article 1 of this law.
This crime is not a true corruption, but a form of arbitrary corruption, where the difference with the crime of corruption is that it includes the element of trafficking in the employee's jobs, which is essential to criminalize the act of corruption, while exploiting the influence of the real or imaginary authority of the employee Competent work required.
They also differ in the object of the crime; in bribery, the objective is to force an employee to work or refrain from doing so or not, but the crime of influence is simply to use his or her real or supposed influence to obtain an advantage.
[ad_2]
Source link
