Is constitutional monarchy appropriate for Arab countries?

Elizabeth came to the throne more than 63 years ago at the age of 25.

Today, as of September 9, Queen Elizabeth II, 89, will surpass her 63-year, seven-month, and two-day rule.

Despite her reign and the decline of the Queen's empire as a symbol of her sovereignty, the reign of Elizabeth II is characterized by the stability of all aspects of life, politics, of the economy and society – a natural culmination, in the eyes of many, of the Kingdom's adoption of a constitutional monarchy at the end of the 17th century, making the parliament elected The legislative power , from which the executive power is represented to the government.

By contrast, most Arab kingdoms rest on an absolute monarchy because the king holds the reins of power and has power over all parts of the state. It also has the power to abolish the elected legislature (if any), as it has already done on several occasions in Kuwait and Jordan. It should be noted that the latter, although it is a constitutional monarchy, the king, formerly Hussein and Abdullah II, currently exerts a considerable influence on the legislative and executive authorities of the country.

The system of government in the Arab world was not the same as today. Some republics today, such as Iraq, Egypt, and Libya, were also kingdoms, but he witnessed coups / revolutions – according to the political guidelines of the historian – that overthrew the institution royal and have been replaced by a republican system.

In a kind of nostalgia, some claim the days of the monarchy in Iraq and Egypt, describing them as "good days" because of their political and social stability far from the current difficult conditions of this country.

Western analysts have attributed the "survival" of Arab monarchies to the effects of the "Arab Spring" for two reasons: its natural wealth, which guaranteed the loyalty of the general public to the king, or his geographical position, and its strategic importance to the partisans of these kingdoms, especially his allies in Washington.

What is the secret of the survival of monarchies, Arab or European?

Which one do you prefer, the Republic or the Kingdom?

Or do you not care about the regime as long as it is accompanied by the stability of the country and the dignity of the people?

Is constitutional monarchy appropriate for Arab countries?