[ad_1]
Published photo, Reuters
CNN cited two knowledgeable sources at the White House who said punishing bin Salman was not an option on the decision table.
The Guardian newspaper published a new report from its correspondent in the US capital, Julian Borger, with the headline : “The White House defends itself by not punishing the crown prince.”
Burger says the US administration quickly began to defend its decision not to impose sanctions on bin Salman, after the National Intelligence Agency’s report was announced, justifying this by leaving the field open to mutual understanding.
Burger explains that despite criticism from prominent leaders of the Riyadh Democratic Party’s human rights violations, White House spokeswoman Jane Sackey supported Washington’s position not to target the Saudi Crown Prince with direct sanctions, in an interview she conducted on Sunday.
“We believe that there is a more effective way to ensure that what happened is not repeated, and at the same time, we leave a common space of understanding with the Kingdom, especially in cases which testify to ‘a mutual agreement of points of view and that the United States has interests, it is diplomacy, quotes Bürger Saki.
Burger explains that it looks like there are decisions to be announced in Washington, but President Joe Biden has not clarified what they are, noting that in general there will be assurance for the Kingdom that ‘from today “the rules will change”.
Biden reportedly said, “We will hold them accountable for human rights violations,” and his claim that he warned King Salman about the release of the intelligence report in a phone call on Friday.
Burger adds that the White House has confirmed that it views 85-year-old King Salman more as a counterpart to President Biden than the 35-year-old Crown Prince, who has more authority over day-to-day practices in the countryside. .
Burger continues that CNN quoted two knowledgeable sources in the White House as saying that the idea of punishing bin Salman was not an option on the decision table, as it would endanger the US presence in Saudi Arabia, and as a result The White House did not ask the state to come up with proposals regarding Punished.
Published photo, Reuters
The report addresses the aspirations of a number of citizens of the region who were forced to leave the Nagorno-Karabakh region when Armenian forces took over.
‘Go home’
We turn to a report by Campbell MacDiarmid, Middle East correspondent for the Daily Telegraph, from Fuzuli, Azerbaijan, titled: “They Want to See Their Land Before Death: Azeris Can’t Wait to Return to Nagorno-Karabakh.”
The report addresses the aspirations of a number of Muslim citizens in the region who were forced to leave the Nagorno-Karabakh region, or the “black garden,” when Armenian forces seized it 27 years ago. .
The journalist explains that one of them is Habib Mammadov, an employee who accompanied a government mission on its visit to the region after Azerbaijan picked him up months ago after fierce battles against them. Armenian forces, during which he visited the city of Agdam, the city he fled from at the age of 14 with his family, but found him. Destroyed after recent battles, Azerbaijani forces were quick to comb it out and ensure it was free of mines and unexploded bombs. be sure for the return of civilians.
And Burger notes that Mammadov has expressed satisfaction and acceptance of the idea of waiting several more months after waiting nearly 3 decades for the day he could return home.
Burger bemoans another number of people, some of whom do not understand the idea of waiting for extra time, especially the elderly, describing one of the scenes in the city of my curiosity, where some elderly people who wanted to go home she stood near a power station under construction and assured him that they wanted to see their land which they had left in Nagorno-Karabakh before they died.
Published photo, EPA
Report shows that people’s fears about the coming period have increased dramatically
“Fears of the future”
And we conclude with The Independent newspaper, which published a report titled “Outrageous and Unacceptable: Burmese Citizens Express Concerns Over New Era of Military Rule”.
The report says the people of Myanmar woke up on the first day of this month due to the internet blackout, as phone apps and social media were suspended, contact with the outside world was lost. and that people came out of their homes to the streets looking. for news, chat via wireless devices.
The report adds that the 5 months of continuous lockdown in the country due to the Corona outbreak has seen many changes as people’s activities shifted to social media.
Despite his absence that day, rumors quickly spread about the military seizure of power, and banks and supermarkets therefore witnessed long lines of people eager to support their families.
The military announced the suspension of the constitution and arrested members of the government and leaders of the ruling party and its leader, Aung San Sochi, whose party won around 80% of the vote in the last election around 3 months.
The report shows that people’s fears about the coming period have grown considerably.
A worker from non-governmental organizations in the country reportedly said: “It is not clear what is going on. Citizens who have witnessed what is happening now in the past know exactly what military rule means for everyone. and its effects on citizens and society. “
The report says this sentiment is widespread among the vast majority, whether it is older people who have experienced previous coups or young people who have been brought up on social media and freely exchanged views. .
One citizen also said: “What is happening is killing the future of the younger generation and the process of development and growth of society in the country, for example, no one will be able to get proper education for the younger generation.”
The report adds that Myanmar was, during its 26 years of totalitarian rule under the leadership of General U Ni Win between 1962 and 1988, one of the most isolated countries in the world, and on top of that, it suffered from extreme poverty and later moved to the suffering of civil war between children of different ethnicities in addition to conflict between civilians and military.
Source link
