[ad_1]
Twelve years after his death, the intellectual career of the Egyptian author and academic Abdel Wahab El-Messiri seems more current in view of the transformations that the Arab world is going through today. Al-Mesiri is considered one of the foremost scholars in the history of the Zionist movement, the Palestinian cause, studies of literature, modernity and contemporary philosophy, in addition to his political activity and involvement in the “Enough” opposition movement.
The late thinker enriched the Arab library with dozens of books in Arabic and English, and varied between encyclopedias, studies and articles, perhaps the most important of which is the “Encyclopedia of Jews, Judaism and Zionism: A New Model of Interpretation ”, which took a quarter of a century to prepare and is considered one of the most important Arab encyclopedias of the twentieth century.
Al-Masiri wrote more than 30 articles published on Al-Jazeera Net, the last of which was an article he had sent for publication on the occasion of his departure, and hosted by the “Without Borders” program two months before. his death, and a two-part special visit program that aired a few days after his death at the Palestinian hospital in Cairo in early July 2008.In this interview, El-Mesiri said that despite the normalization of governments Arabs with Israel, “the masses, with their senses, remain hostile to Zionism.
Tragedy and comedy
In his article “The Zionist State Between Tragedy and Comedy”, first published after his death, El-Messiri wrote: “Contrary to what many imagine, the obsession with the end of the Jewish state is nested in Israeli consciousness, and they are right in this, because we must not forget that all similar colonization enclaves (the Crusader kingdoms – the French colonization enclave in Algeria – the apartheid state in South Africa) have experienced the same fate, that is to say the disappearance.
In his article, Al-Masiri reviewed some of the jokes made by the Israelis that express the reality of their view of reality and their response to it, “a different view of the Zionist statements and the image presented by Arab media and some of the academic studies that just study Torah, Talmud and Zionist statements, instead of studying the reality of the Zionist settlement with all its contradictions and achievements and failures.
Al-Masiri says that the joke, with all of its pros and cons, expresses what is called the unspoken, and these are things that cannot be said for many reasons. These reasons can be subjective, in the sense that you cannot face them frankly, or they can be objective reasons, in the sense that you are afraid to express your opinion openly.
Al-Mesiri reviews some of the jokes he has collected from Israeli newspapers and talks about the Israelis saying: “The West told them it would settle them in Zion, in Palestine, the land of butter and honey. (as the biblical story says them), a land inhabited by Amalekites and Canaanites who can simply be exterminated (as the biblical story also says). And as the historical narrative tells them what happened in other colonization experiences, such as the United States and Australia).
He continues, however, “Instead, they have found that Palestine is teeming with its population which is multiplying in quantity and quality, and they are resisting them fiercely. In fact, the West wanted to get rid of them by installing them in an area of strategic importance to it, so that they could protect its interests, and that they entered the path of Their conflict with the Palestinians and Arabs continued and did not stop from the start of settlement in 1882 until 2007, and there is no end to the conflict in sight. This generated for them a grim sense of difficult historical situation and a sense of loss of direction. “
History and solutions
In his article “The Zionist Vision of History”, El-Messiri explains the philosophy of “pansism”, that God dwells in all his creatures or in one of them and identifies with them to become an essence, and pursues “the Jewish view of history – in my perception – a pantheistic view, which means that some rabbis thought that God He descended on the Jewish people and He became a chosen people, all his actions – they be good or bad – are sacred deeds, and his story has become a sacred story.
He considers that the Zionists inherited this pantheistic view, which appears in the “confusion between temporal history and sacred history. The story that has been mentioned in the Quran – or the stories mentioned therein – is not a chronological story, but rather a story that aims to guide people.
Therefore, the stories of the prophets – as shown by Dr Ali Abdel Wahed Wafi – are not complete, but specific events of importance have been chosen, so that the moral lesson becomes clear and until the sermon appears.
Therefore, it is not possible to speak of an Islamic story, but rather of stories of Muslims. And chronological history is the field of chaos, and the field of rise and fall, while sacred history is an ideal history, in which good is rewarded and evil is rewarded. The task of sacred history is to provide man with standards by which chronological history is judged.
On the contrary, some Zionists believe that God has settled in history, and then human temporal history – the realm of orientation and delusion – mingles with the sacred history through which the will of God manifests itself, in every thing great and small, as the late thinker wrote.
Therefore, we find that Zionists believe that the stories mentioned in the Old Testament (the story of kings and tribes) are both sacred and temporal. Therefore, we find that the Bible stories are presented in their entirety with all its facts. Facts from the history of the Hebrew kings – for example – are presented in their entirety from the time the king ascended the throne until his dead.
The purpose is neither to exhort nor to provide the believer with moral standards, but rather the purpose is to watch all the facts, they are the subject of solutions, and they are important in themselves, and they go to the -beyond good and evil, and therefore they cannot be judged by any moral standard, according to El-Mesiri’s expression.
the Arab world
In his article “The New Middle East in American-Zionist Perception,” El-Mesiri says that “it can be said with great confidence that Western strategy towards the Islamic world since the mid-nineteenth century has stemmed from the belief in the need to divide the Arab and Islamic world into different ethnic and religious states, so that it is easy to control.
He continues: “This perception of the Middle East stems from the perception that history is completely stopped in this region, and that the Arab people will remain just a tool in the hands of most of their leaders who blindly obey the United States. .
He continues: “In the framework of partition, the Zionist settlement state, implanted in the Arab body, becomes a natural state, rather a leader. In fact, the partition is a normalization process for the Zionist state, which suffers from its structural anomalies. , like a foreign body implanted in the Arab region. “
Al-Masiri considers that this point of view embodies a vision that sees the Arab East as a space or region without history or common heritage, inhabited by religious and ethnic groups that are not linked by any link, have no memory. historical or meaningless. of dignity.
More culture
[ad_2]
Source link
