The last scene of the Brotherhood in the Arab world

belbalady.net The spark of the Arab Spring broke, after which the Brotherhood came to power in fraternal Green Tunisia, and the last Brotherhood stronghold in Tunisia also fell. These uprisings were the first step in allowing the terrorist group of the Muslim Brotherhood shrouded in the curtain of religion to implement the new Middle East plan, and the group was then able to rise to power, until it came to power. head of power in several countries, including Egypt. and Tunisia, which are still resisting.

And the question comes …

Were the peoples of these countries right in choosing which group to rule and sticking to their agendas? Each people has their reasons which make them hope that “Islam is the solution” to consolidate the revolutions’ demands for freedom and a decent life, which led to the miracle that the group had been planning for more than 80 years, which is to to control the Arab countries and to serve the project of division of the Middle East. But the group did not stick to their plan for long.

On the night of June 25, Tunisian President Kais Saied took decisions that he described as measures to save Tunisia from the Brothers and from its political arm, the Movement of the Ennahda Brothers. Saeed froze the authority of parliament, lifted the immunity of its members and removed Prime Minister Hisham al-Mashishi from office, then took on the task of forming a new government. The Tunisian affairs observer can imagine the gravity of the situation if Saeed did not agree to prevent the group from ruling unilaterally, as his rulings sought to rid the state of the group’s bloody methods of using violence. , and to cover themselves behind the supporters of the group. which are absent from its bitter reality, which is its dependence on religion and for only jumping on power, And the empowerment of the group politically, as mentioned in the teachings of the messages of Hassan al-Banna, the terrorist.

Tunisia faces a barrage of threats of violence from the group, which recalls the statement by the group’s leader in Egypt, Mohamed El-Beltagy, “The moment Morsi returns to power is the moment terrorism stops in the country. Sinai “. And if that indicates anything, it indicates the group’s adoption of violence and extremism to control governance and monopoly power. It should be noted that the group resorted to violence before the decisions of Tunisian President Kais Saied in their power empowerment project, as supporters of the group attacked parliamentarian Abeer Moussa after her chants against the Muslim Brotherhood and her demand to detain Ghannouchi, speaker of the dissolved parliament. , responsible for having visited Turkey without the knowledge of the Head of State. The group bases its use of bloody methods on legitimacy and constitution.

The fact of the legitimacy and constitutionality of the decisions of Tunisian President Kais Saied counteracts the Muslim Brotherhood’s assertions that his decisions constitute a blow against the Tunisian constitution, based on article 80 of the Constitution, which reads: “The president of the Republic may, in a state of imminent danger threatening the entity of the nation, the security or independence of the country, make it impossible to march with it. the people. Its decisions, at the local, regional and international levels, are also seen as a response to the demands of the Tunisian people for fear of the Brotherhood’s control over all aspects of the country’s governance through an attempt to betray the State, to suppress the freedoms, to attack Tunisian women and the attempts to grab power in the Tunisian parliament, as evidenced by the unfortunate events of the last period. This prompted Tunisian popular movements to support Tunisia’s bailout and categorically reject the Muslim Brotherhood’s political presence, stressing that the group has left nothing but destruction and devastation.

What the group left in Tunisia is no different from what it has left in other Arab countries since the start of democratic transition activities after the Arab Spring, due to the failure of the Muslim Brotherhood to stand. present as a convincing political alternative to the Arab peoples at this sensitive stage, because the movements of political Islam in general could not be He has effective leaders loved by the people, or to establish a political project that serves the demands of revolutions On the contrary, it came into conflict with state institutions and other political political parties, in order to build the strongholds of power of the Brothers, although the fate of political Islam movements in different countries present similarities such as the evolution of the situation, the latter in Tunisia compared to what happened in Egypt when the has its own characteristics.

We see through the Tunisian experience that Tunisian President Qais Saeed was not the only observer of the Egyptian experience with the Muslim Brotherhood. imposed until it is in control. As for the group in Egypt, it was more rushed, because the dissolved Freedom and Justice Party took advantage of the relative success of the elections to subjugate Egyptian society and impose its agendas and ideology on it. But the similarity between the Brotherhood of Tunisia and the Brotherhood of Egypt is their internal failure to build a solid base of trust with the two peoples. In addition to its failure at regional and international levels to develop strategies to build strong alliances, which made international parties fear their access to power. There is a lot of talk about the group’s failure in Syria after it pulled out of politics to pave the way for regional deals between Turkey, Russia and Iran.

All these characteristics combine with the others mentioned above to create a political situation based on the widening of the distance between the Islamists and the awareness of the Arab peoples of the massive transformations of their societies and the resulting demands. In addition to the certainty of the peoples on the reality of the Brotherhood, who do not care about the homeland in the face of the interest of the group, and who have been exposed by the facts and have ruled on the invalidity of their claims based on the possibility of achieving “democratic Islam” by dissipating any distance that separates them from their association with terrorist organizations such as Daesh and Al-Qaeda. All of this led to the fall of the group’s strongholds, castle after castle, and with each fall the death bell of the group’s reign was ringing irreversibly.