[ad_1]
<div id = "firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type = "article" data-bind-html-compile = "article.body" data-first-article-body = "
More than a decade has passed since the National Academy of Medicine,For the United States Its pivotal report on the survivors of Cancer, Which stimulated patients interested in patient care in 2006.
The report advocated changing the way we think, rather than focusing on treating tumors. We insist that lifelong health problems are reduced by malignant tumors, surgical procedures, treatments and procedures. radiation.
The researchers said in a report published in a newspaper National Cancer Institute Many of the recommendations made in the 2006 report have not been fully implemented, despite the progress made.
Dr. Ron Klein, Senior Researcher of the Report, Program Development Center "Medicare"And" Medicaid "In Baltimore:" One of the great successes is the recognition of the challenges facing cancer survivors. TreatmentAs the toxicity on the body or the premature aging due to Chemotherapy The effects of surgeries, the psychological stress of not knowing if the cancer will reoccur, and the physical burden of a treatment that sometimes lasts for long periods, perhaps indefinitely. "
He added cross E-mail"Recognizing the existence of these challenges is driving managers on the ground to develop and test new models of caregiver survivorship and to question the quality of care provided."
The Klein report states that the National Academy of Medicine's report allowed health care providers to improve service delivery to help patients and their families understand the importance of post-treatment phase.
For example, the report recommends patients to benefit from health care plans after their survival to help them during periodic examinations and treatments once the tumor is over, but it is unclear to what extent these diets are actually used or they have improved the results.
According to the researchers' new report, part of the problem lies in the lack of clear criteria for assessing or improving the quality of health care provided to victims. Most quality measures focus on oncology rather than helping them adapt to their lives later on.
New report adds that doctors are not very attached to training providers Health services On sponsorship recommendations The survivors Although professional and voluntary institutions have developed training programs in this regard.
">
More than a decade has passed since the US National Academy of Medicine released its key report on cancer survivors, which inspired patients to focus on patient care in 2006.
The report advocated changing the way we think, rather than focusing on treating tumors. We insist that lifelong health problems are reduced by malignant tumors, surgical procedures, treatments and procedures. radiation.
The researchers said in a report published by the National Cancer Institute that many of the recommendations contained in the 2006 report had not been fully implemented, despite the progress made.
"One of the great successes is the awareness of the challenges post-treatment cancer survivors face, such as body toxicity or premature aging due to chemotherapy and its effects," said Dr. Ron Klein, Senior Scientist at the Baltimore Medicare and Medicaid Development Center. The psychological stress of not knowing if the cancer will come back, and the physical burden of a treatment that sometimes lasts for long periods, may be indefinitely. "
"By recognizing these challenges, leaders in the field are developing and testing new models for victim care and demanding quality for the care they receive," he said.
The Klein report states that the National Academy of Medicine's report allowed health care providers to improve service delivery to help patients and their families understand the importance of post-treatment phase.
For example, the report recommends patients to benefit from health care plans after their survival to help them during periodic examinations and treatments once the tumor is over, but it is unclear to what extent these diets are actually used or they have improved the results.
According to the researchers' new report, part of the problem lies in the lack of clear criteria for assessing or improving the quality of health care provided to victims. Most quality measures focus on oncology rather than helping them adapt to their lives later on.
The new report adds that physicians are not very committed to training health service providers to the Academy's recommendations on survivor care, although professional and voluntary institutions have developed training programs. in this regard.
