Chinese scientist sentenced to death for manipulating the genes of two children



[ad_1]

Dr. Hui Xianqui's colleagues explained that he could be severely punished for his "hateful" searches and that he should be charged with bribery, a crime of which the perpetrator was executed in China. Badge of Professor Robin Lovell of the Francis Creek Institute in London: "Some people lost their heads because of similar charges."

Xian who surprised the public and the scientific community by announcing in a YouTube video that he had managed to modify twin genes from human embryos. Academics have denounced his scientific approach and described his intentions as "immoral". Today, he is said to be under constant surveillance by armed guards, after being threatened with death, and to have filed a lawsuit against him, according to the website "Daily Mail".

All reports indicate that Ziankui is under heavy surveillance today, but it is unclear whether it is a form of house arrest or whether the guards are surrounded by him to protect him. Professor Lovel's badge at a conference: Health, and likely to lose people who helped him in their work "

He studied physics and not biology, so he was ineligible to conduct research on his own. He would have used his £ 40 million fortune to finance the project and hired a number of highly qualified and trained scientists, but only a few research details, a violation of every moral principle in genetics.

"Many people advised him not to, but it was probably too late," said Professor Lovell's Badge. "Ziankui was a physicist who knew little about science, and has tremendous wealth and arrogance, and insisted on being proactive in doing something that would change the world in his belief."

Lulu and Nana were born in October 2007. Xianqui is thought to have modified its genes to fight HIV, and these dangerous genetic changes are passed on to future generations.

The modification of the human gene is forbidden in Britain, America and many other countries of the world. The researchers described Ziankoy's experiment as "wild and morally indefensible", even assuming that his claims were scientifically correct, which we did not know yet. In a scientific journal, where the rest of the scientists can read it again.

However, many scientists have argued that genetic testing on healthy children resembled using them as test mice. However, George Church, geneticist and renowned professor at Harvard, has defended himself in trying to promote human resistance to HIV, which he described as "a serious and growing threat to public health," I think. that the goal of Ziankui is justified to give couples infected with the virus the opportunity to see their children protected from a similar fate, "he said.

[ad_2]
Source link