[ad_1]
There has been an interesting debate in the form of tweets on the social networking site Twitter, between a prominent exhibitor and one of the princes of the royal family, around Qatar.
After a video showing the follow-up of King Abdul Aziz's grandson, Prince Abdulrahman bin Mousaed, a close associate of Mohammed bin Salman, following a match played in the country's "BN Sport", l '. Opposition Omar Abdel Aziz Zahrani spoke about the violation by the son of official statements on demonization. As a hostile and abusive channel for the kingdom and to prevent the sale and renovation of its equipment in Saudi Arabia.
"To watch the Asian Cup, there are two ways: either to follow them through the official carrier, or to follow them in Koot Bay, and even better for the reasons I mentioned, and certainly if I had to follow them through Bayout to criticize my hostility to rights and my support for piracy, I'm waiting for you other than that.You're not as neutral to me as I am to you! "
"It's very beautiful," said Omar Abdel Aziz. "That means you say what the state has said about the BBC Sport Channel and that it hurts the Kingdom and supports terrorism, in exchange for your enjoyment of football games."
He added: "You have not supported the (unjust) state decisions for your entertainment and your entertainment, and others have been forced to leave his job in Qatar and have returned to Saudi Arabia after the crisis. "
Al-Zahrani Hafitha Ibn Mas' ed said: "It is not necessary to make an impolite speech.The State has made it clear in its last position that it respected the rights of the intellectual property and that he was against piracy, claiming to have confiscated thousands of pirated devices in a statement issued several months ago.I know that if you are convinced, you will be convinced, but that is for clarify the question to those who seek the truth.
Al-Zahrani said that the Saudi prince had not answered the question. "You have evaded the question twice and there are no misleading words." Here is the state's position through its official channels and BN Sport news agencies that it is offensive to the homeland and supports terrorism.
The question is clear: is sport offensive and pro-terrorist?
Yes, why do you support the owner?
No, why are you blocking his position? "
Saudi Prince Abdurrahman bin Mousaed said: "What I put in square brackets, I see it as a rude word, and I answered you but you read without wanting to understand what happened. When transferring the World Cup to BN Sport was unprofessional and overtook Saudi Arabia.What I told you is about the situation of piracy.Try to read and if you want an answer, you will find it if you wish it.
Omar al-Zahrani concluded the debate with a mantra to which Ibn Musaid did not respond. He said: "Let's hack my speech, no hacking.
The state, through its media and news platforms, claims that PSP Sport is funded for terrorism. If you agree with that, why do you support a terrorist-funded channel with an owner?
If this is not the case, why is its location still blocked and why has the state not retreated? "
It should be noted that the Saudi government and its support for almost semi-declared piracy, "Bout", have been revoked, following the threat of "BN" to pursue "piracy" in international courts.
Read also: Amir near Ibn Salman looks at "BN Sport" (video)
There are two ways to watch the Asian Cup: – either follow the official carrier, or follow the official channel and the best official for the reasons I mentioned, and I'm certainly Lucent. I pursue through Piot to criticize my aggression on rights and support for piracy. I do not expect you else
– Abdulrahman bin Mousaed (@abdulrahman) January 6, 2019
The state clearly stated in its latest position that it respected intellectual property rights and that it was opposed to piracy and said it confiscated thousands of pirated devices in a statement issued many months ago. I do not recommend convincing you. I know that if you are convinced, you will be convinced. For those who seek the truth
– Abdulrahman bin Mousaed (@abdulrahman) January 6, 2019
You have avoided the question twice and there are no polite words. It is now the position of the state through its official channels and BBC news agencies that it is offensive to the homeland and supports terrorism.
The question is clear: is sport offensive and pro-terrorist?
Yes, why do you support the owner?
No .. Why, then, are you blocking his position? pic.twitter.com/iVwAEujjuz– Omar Abdul Aziz Omar Abdulaziz (@ oamaz7) January 6, 2019
What I put in parentheses, I see a rude word and I answered you but you read without wanting to understand. What happened when the transfer from the World Cup to the BBC Sport was unprofessional and surpassed the Saudi call to a position. As for the state of piracy, I told you. Try to read and if you want an answer, you'll find it if you want
– Abdulrahman bin Mousaed (@abdulrahman) January 6, 2019
Let's hack my speech, not about hacking. Revered for the third time:
The state, through its media and news platforms, says BN Sport is financed by terrorism.
If you agree with them, why support a terrorist-funded chain with the owner?
If not, why is its location still blocked and why has the state not withdrawn?
– Omar Abdul Aziz Omar Abdulaziz (@ oamaz7) January 6, 2019
[ad_2]
Source link
