[ad_1]
<div id = "firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type = "article" data-bind-html-compile = "article.body" data-first-article-body = "
On Monday, a preliminary investigation confirmed that a second woman was pregnant with a fetus, media reported Monday. "Genetically Modified" and that he will be under medical supervision, without giving more details about them, according to a British newspaper "Daily Mail".
Jianqui, biomedical scientist from Stanford University in California, knows the Chinese scientist Genetic modificationsIt's "It's very early to get an embryo based on an ultrasound".
Harleft said: "Giancoe m learned about the pregnancy at the Human Genome Conference at Hong Kong In November. I think the fetus was very young at the time and can not be detected clinically "According to Agence France-Presse.
The world has shown that he had not met Giancoi after the conference, to put the latter in the custody of security.
Last November, the Chinese authorities opened an investigation into the Jianqui process, which used a new tool to rewrite the genetic code of twins before they were born.
The National Health Authority of China has ordered the action "Immediate Investigation" in this process, especially since the world has provided no evidence to prove its operation and n & # 39; revealed no details regarding the identity of the two children, "The Guardian" British.
Giancoi explained that he had genetically modified the embryos of 7 women during their fertility treatment and had given birth to one of them, noting that what he had done It was not a form of treatment or prevention of a genetic disease, but an attempt to grant a natural status to a few people. , The ability to resist future infectious diseases, such as AIDS virus.
The world refused to divulge the parents of the genetically modified babies, and to reveal where they were, in a clinic or hospital where the genetic modification was carried out.
There is no independent confirmation of his state of health nor has it been published in a scientific journal so that other experts and scientists can judge its accuracy or accuracy.
This decision has angered the scientific community of various parts of the world, especially since it is considered "Human Experiences", a movement legally banned in many countries.
">
On Monday, a preliminary investigation confirmed that a second woman had a "genetically modified" embryo and that she would be under medical supervision without giving further details, according to the Daily Mail Daily.
"It's too early to get an embryo based on an ultrasound," said William Harlebt, a biomedical scientist at Stanford University in California, who knows Chinese scientist Giancui.
"Gianqui learned about pregnancy at the Hong Kong Human Genome Conference in November, I think the fetus was very young at the time and can not be clinically detected," Harlebt said. .
The world has shown that he had not met Giancoi after the conference, to put the latter in the custody of security.
Last November, the Chinese authorities opened an investigation into the Jianqui process, which used a new tool to rewrite the genetic code of twins before they were born.
The National Health Commission of China has ordered an "immediate investigation" into the operation, especially since the world has provided no evidence of its operation and that the identity of these two children have not been revealed, the Guardian reported.
Giancoi explained that he had genetically modified the embryos of 7 women during their fertility treatment and had given birth to one of them, noting that what he had done It was not a form of treatment or prevention of a genetic disease, but an attempt to grant a natural status to a few people. The ability to resist future infectious diseases, such as HIV / AIDS.
The world refused to divulge the parents of the genetically modified babies, and to reveal where they were, in a clinic or hospital where the genetic modification was carried out.
There is no independent confirmation of his state of health nor has he been published in a scientific journal, so that other experts and scientists can judge its accuracy or accuracy.
This decision has angered the scientific community around the world, especially because it is considered a "human experience", a process that is legally prohibited in many countries.
