The continuation of the Sudanese protests changes the position of the US administration

The Sudanese regime has put itself in a great political stalemate when it bet on the inability of the masses to remain on the street for a long time, on the fact that the international community would not support the protesters and that two months or so after the beginning of the demonstrations, the burning forces continued to grow and even spread and spread, as well as hatred, A lot of internal politics, and more serious than there are any external forces began to change their positions in Khartoum.

Speaking to US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Friday, he said: "We hope the voices of the people will be heard and that you will get a transition." This is a remarkable change in the position of his country, which has expressed itself in vague terms. Bashir and continue to govern if you are under silent demonstrations.

The administration seemed very indifferent to what was happening in Sudan, knowing that Khartoum was able to stop and resorted to formal measures calling for the release of detainees and the renewal of international sanctions in the Security Council on a routine basis because it was not to be lifted. Just before the demonstrations erupt.

Interest and degree are related to the network of interests that Washington has maintained with the Sudanese regime in the fight against terrorism and the transfer of militants, as evidenced by the coverage of the majority of US media, which have not benefited from large-scale events in Sudan, as was the case in some Arab countries eight years ago. And the uprisings that circulated at that time are important information on satellite channels, newspapers and websites.

Clearly, a set of determinants has made the administration too flexible for the actions of the Sudanese regime, making Washington go beyond what can be described as the democratic values ​​it seeks to anchor in the spirit of the world and did not support the Sudanese in the right to protest.

At the forefront of the determinants, President Trump's humanitarian values ​​and his belief in materialism can be exploited in the form of maximizing interests in the case of Sudan if the Bashir regime goes beyond its crisis and ends demonstrations with bloody blood on the streets.

The complex of former President Barack Obama, who supports the revolutions of the Arab Spring, has created crises for the Trump administration in the region. Trump managed to overcome some, but its negative repercussions continued to dampen Washington's support for new revolts, even if they were just, for fear of re-speaking obscure scenarios in which the United States found itself under the pretext of support demonstrations to bring down diets. Certain countries.

Estimates reached the Oval Office, most of which were aimed at allowing President al-Bashir to face the demonstrations with a fist of iron, negotiations and polarization, and a change from the inside out (a coup d'etat). State) when necessary, because Khartoum has the necessary tools to address it, the entire Sudanese regime.

The success of the masses in resisting and staying in the streets for about two months, continuing to increase dramatically and defying all the means used by the Sudanese regime, adding to the crisis a political luster beyond the limits of the economic form that accompanied them from the beginning, stressing that the will of the protesters was strong and not frustrated by the inability to respond to their demands. The desire to arm them has become an element of power for them and a weakness of some structures of the system. The longer the period, the more the masses understood that they were gaining new political ground. Zam, but failed to reduce losses, and the opposite happened when the positions of the international community tend to outweigh the masses began.

Khartoum has built one of its calculations to face the crisis that the uprisings have become contaminated in the eyes of many peoples by their negative political mechanisms, which is perhaps true and a source of support from some countries, but this did not prevent recurrence in Sudan, an indication of the extent of boredom Citizens came from the ruling regime and confronted them with confrontation at retirement even if this confrontation would cost them a heavy toll, which would darken various countries, the most important being the United States, which did not seem to gradually skew the protesters.

Signs of change in the US position carry many indications, most of which tend to overturn the Sudanese regime's desire, especially that President Omar al-Bashir has become incompetent and can no longer face a long confrontation. And convince the masses to calm down and abandon the opposition by the street.

Many countries visited or addressed to Bashir, secretly and publicly, did not provide him with the necessary support and feared to extend his hands generously, to fall into battle and to fight with those who followed him, as well as the Increasing aspects of the conflict, if the heir came from outside the constituency from which President Bashir Therefore, the position of neutrality was a compromise for some, but the continuation of the protests and its momentum day after day have changed the attitude of the United States and others.

The fact that President al-Bashir did not understand the political lessons of many Arab countries, who tried to avoid the descent of the masses on the streets, understood that the process of descent is easy, while The return home can become a complex process, which is one of the reasons why it has enacted laws and laws criminalizing large-scale protests.

The uprisings that Sudan experienced in 1964 and 1985 have different rituals and the atmosphere it imposed on those who led them was different from what is happening now, according to which the The current intifada should not reach the level reached by previous movements, which could fall behind the final result.

"General Time" is no longer useful to those who use it in power and rely on it to overcome the obstacle of the protests; he became a positive tool in the hands of the protesters who realized that the regime had nothing to alleviate the crisis and knew that he could at any time turn to the element of resolution that was theirs. would be favorable. On them.

The evolution in Sudan shows this result: President al-Bashir has not been able to resolve the crisis and there is no indication that he will be able to do so in the near future by providing specific economic assistance. or by ensuring that the major powers of the international community do not hesitate. This is in the interest of the protesters, and reinforces the saying that Sudan is preparing for political surprises, showing their characteristics every passing day and protesters roaming the streets and raising signs of demands, President Bashir unable to solve the insoluble crisis.

Mohamed Abu El Fadl – The Arabs of London