[ad_1]
We have not known about this Turkish policy for decades: certain factors have contributed to the improvement of Turkish-Arab relations during the period preceding the revolutions of the Arab Spring, including historical and cultural factors, as well as cooperation in security and the fight against terrorism.
Turkish politics of recent years is no longer in demand in the Arab world, it arouses much resentment and contempt: the neutral observer evokes the confusion of the Turkish political approach, the change of Attitude and opportunistic opportunism. Proof of this trend, which means a strategic change in Turkish politics, we are not against Ankara to seek the interests, it is legitimate for them and for others, but it should not be at the expense of stability in the region or cause unrest in neighboring countries.
The deviation of Turkish politics has emerged since the ideological dimension of the national interest was supported by Islamist groups, especially the Muslim Brotherhood, and became a headquarters in coordination with the State of Qatar to support the movement to reach the throne of power in the Arab countries.
It was not Turkish politics that we had known for decades. Some factors contributed to the improvement of relations between Turkey and the Arab world in the run-up to the revolutions of the Arab Spring, including historical and cultural factors as well as security cooperation and the fight against terrorism. terrorism. We do not forget the role of the theory of Oglu or what is called politics The problems that helped bridge the gap between the Arabs and the Turks at the time, the Arabs hailed the Opening of Turkey at the time and its optimism and perceived that they had found a champion for them and their problems, especially in the face of the Iranian expansion or even the defense of legitimate Arab issues before it would appear to them later that it was no longer obvious to them that it was only a Turkish project in search of regional seeking to impose its hegemony, and his speeches are just propaganda consumer letters and media to attract commoners and riffraff in the Arab street.
The deviation of Turkish politics to the surface since the ideological dimension of the national interest has been supported by political Islam groups, especially the Muslim Brotherhood, and has become a headquarters in coordination with the 39, State of Qatar to support the movement to achieve the throne of power in the Arab countries.
The Turkish leader has an internal project aimed at achieving it, both inside and outside Turkey, so that he is an absolute government leader and is looking for a role. and a regional influence to restore Ottoman fantasies and dreams. He took advantage of the events in the region and used them as much as possible for his purposes. There is an agreement in Turkey between the main currents and political forces, according to which the president's policy serves neither Turkey nor the stability of the region. Erdogan is worried about the rush of his foreign policy, which has plunged Ankara into much needed problems and interactions. Even within the Justice and Development Party, there are voices that say that the uniqueness of the decision and the hegemony over everything can have serious consequences for civil peace in Turkey, and can -being that the departure of a number of symbols and their absence from the scene testify to a dissatisfaction with the policy of Erdogan.
It is surprising that Turkish leaders have claimed the success of Turkish democracy, although outstanding issues have not yet been brought to the human rights record and its deterioration in recent years. , or attacks on journalists, journalists and political opponents in the guide to the war against the Gulen group, the arrest of thousands of Turks, the language of the opposite threat, Against the PKK and finally the Cypriot file .
The Turkish agreement with the Gulf crisis and then the issue of Khashoggi's assassination and its politicization and its gains, as well as the comments made by the Turkish authorities towards Saudi Arabia and accepted by the United Arab Emirates, not to mention the reminder of the Ottoman legacy on the island of Suakin in Sudan, all unacceptable and abnormal escalation methods and opposed to Turkish politics. We must not neglect the psychological (psychological) problem of President Erdogan, who absolutely draws foreign policy and does not listen to his advisers. That's where the root of the problem lies.
After the collapse of the brotherhood and his disappointment with US President Trump, he felt that he needed to make adjustments to save what could be saved and that he had realized his accumulated mistakes by opening up the Assad regime and opening a chain with Cairo. Restore one of the wanted people, without knowing the accuracy and accuracy of this trend: isolation, deterioration of the economic situation, the low price of the pound, the mobility of the street and the repercussions of repression, are they reasons to revisit its confused policies or a tactical approach? Reply by!
Quoting "Riyadh"
Source link
