[ad_1]
The Mecca Court of Appeal rejected the sentence of the criminal court on the incarceration of a Saudi girl who incited a resident to burn her brother with burnt water, including two years and four years of imprisonment. 'imprisonment. The court found that the criminal decision was light and asked that the sentence imposed on the incited and active girl be aggravated. The court promised to appeal the fact that water had been poured on the face of an entire family and had burned "one of the most heinous, new and deadly crimes" and recommended that the Case be referred back to the prosecution to demand the death of the accused in the case of proven intent. Subsequently, the criminal court responded to the appeal and decided to lift and double the penalty of general law and to obtain the imperative judgment that private law remained.
According to the reasoning of the Appeal Judges (as seen by Okaz), the incident deliberately injured a family of six (brothers, sisters, father and mother) and must ensure that the victims of the family claim their rights. even the right when they want it. The court asked questions about the family's fate, saying: How are they going to live the rest of their lives with this distortion, which affects their self-esteem and their way of life and can prevent girls from marrying and to live with people in a natural way?
The Jeddah court responded to the appeal by re-examining the sentence and decided to imprison the executor for 8 years and the girl charged for 4 years.
The price of distortions and loss of sight .. million riyals and a luxury car
Authorities accused the girl of inciting a person to throw the lion above her brother and family, causing severe burns and many of them having lost their sight.
The trial revealed that the girl had incited the culprit to the crime because of family disputes and had paid in advance 50,000 riyals in cash and had promised him a million riyals and a luxury car after the riyals. to have got rid of his brother. The suspect claimed to have used electronic applications such as tango, emo, intramager, online chat, vasap and email to communicate with the author over a six-month period.
The author admitted that he had coordinated the work with the instigator, followed the victim and his family after his departure with his wife and children, and that he had poured incendiary material into the car, injuring family members. The Prosecutor attached medical reports identifying the situation of the victims as well as the confession of the author and the confirmation of the girl charged. The court held several hearings over the course of two years and sentenced the girl for inciting another person to kill her brother, causing the fire as well as his family. The court decided to retain the private law claim when the victim was affected.
[ad_2]
Source link
