[ad_1]
Communication – Agencies:
The Arab world has largely opposed the recognition by US President Donald Trump of Israel's sovereignty over the Golan Heights, thus confirming Syria's dependence on the Golan Heights.
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia has expressed its total rejection and condemnation of what has been described as the US Administration's statement to recognize Israel's sovereignty over the occupied Syrian Golan Heights.
The official news agency announced that the Kingdom had confirmed its consistent and principled position on the Golan Heights.
"The Kingdom has called on all parties to respect the resolutions of international legitimacy and the UN Charter," the statement said.
Bahrain
The Kingdom of Bahrain regretted the announcement made by the United States of America of the recognition of the sovereignty of Israel on the Syrian Golan Heights.
The Bahraini Ministry of Foreign Affairs has affirmed its strong position that the Golan Heights are Arab-Syrian territories occupied by Israel in June 1967, in accordance with United Nations Security Council resolutions.
Kuwait
The Kuwaiti Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the decision violated international law and its resolutions, in particular resolution 497, which called on Israel to cancel the annexation of the Syrian Golan Heights and to consider its decisions in the Golan as void of any legal effect.
According to Kuwaiti Deputy Foreign Minister Khalid al-Jarallah, Kuwait has expressed regret over the US decision on the Golan, saying it intends to take steps to "contain the tension in the country." the region".
He added that Trump's decision would lead to "further tension and a deterioration of the already stalled peace process," underscoring his country's firm stance that the Golan is a occupied Syrian territory. He also pointed out that this decision contravenes international laws, Security Council resolutions and resolution 497, which calls on Israel not to annex Golan Heights.
Kuwait, through this statement, called for US "friends" to reconsider this decision because of negative reactions and repercussions.
United Arab Emirates
The UAE stressed that this measure undermined the chances of achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region, noting that stability and peace could not be achieved as long as Israel continued its occupation of the Palestinian and Arab territories.
And stressed that the Golan is an occupied Syrian Arab land and that the decision of the US administration does not change this reality.
Lebanon
Lebanon was the first Arab country, with the exception of Syria, to condemn Trump's signing of the Golan Decree, where the Lebanese Foreign Ministry said in a statement that the decision "violates all rules of international law and undermines any effort to bring about a just peace, the principle of land for peace falls, there will be no more peace to give. "
The ministry pointed out that "the Golan Heights are a Syrian Arab land and that no decision can change this incident, any more than a country falsifies history by transferring ownership of the land from One country to another ". If Israel believes it will expand its occupation of the territory by violence and aggression, it will find itself in greater isolation and facing a new military defeat, will not benefit from power or racism, and will only find security within the framework of a just and comprehensive peace. He will not benefit either from the new war against Gaza, which we strongly condemn. "
Palestine
Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas has strongly condemned Trump's decision to recognize Israel's sovereignty over the occupied Golan Heights and Israeli raids on Gaza.
The Palestinian presidency reiterated in a statement that "sovereignty is not decided by Israel or the United States of America, regardless of the duration of the occupation, and that the Palestinian cause and Jerusalem will remain in its more sacred and that the occupied Palestinian territories, the Palestinian, Arab and international lines can not be bypassed ".
According to the statement, Abbas "stressed that there was no legitimacy for anyone without the resolutions of the Security Council, the UN General Assembly and the Peace Initiative. Arab".
jordan
Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi said his country's position was "coherent and clear in rejecting the annexation of the occupied Golan by Israel and rejecting any resolution recognizing this annexation as a unilateral decision that would increase the tension in the region and would not change the fact that the occupied Golan is a Syrian territory Occupation consistent with the resolutions of international legitimacy and the Arab peace initiative. "
Al-Safadi added that Security Council resolution 497 (1981), which rejected Israel's decision to annex the occupied Golan, clearly affirmed the position of the international community on the Golan Heights and affirmed the character Israel's imposition of its laws and administration in the occupied Syrian Golan.
Iraq
In turn, the Iraqi Foreign Ministry announced through its spokesman, Ahmed Al-Sahaf, that "the US call to recognize the sovereignty of the Israeli occupation over the Syrian Golan gives legitimacy to the occupation and is contrary to international law ".
He added that "Iraq supports the international legitimacy resolutions issued by the UN Security Council, which provides for the end of the occupation".
Al-Sahaf stressed that "the old age of occupation by putting one's hand on the land it occupied does not confer on it legitimacy and sovereignty".
Qatar
For its part, Qatar has expressed its "rejection of America's recognition of America's sovereignty of the Israeli entity over the Golan Heights in Syria" and echoed in a statement by the ministry Foreign Affairs "reaffirming its position on the principle of the permanent presence of the Golan Heights in the Arab lands".
"Any unilateral decision to recognize the sovereignty of Israel on the Golan Heights will be a major obstacle to the desired peace in the region," she said.
Arab League
Arab League Secretary General Ahmed Aboul Gheit strongly criticized the US decision to recognize Israel 's sovereignty over the Golan, saying it was "deadly". a null and void decision ".
In a statement, Aboul Gheit stressed that the Trump Declaration reflected "a situation of exit from international law in a spirit and in a manner that reduces the status of the United States of America in the region and in the world".
The secretary general of the Arab League pointed out that the US statement did not change the legal status of the Golan, pointing out that the Golan is a occupied Syrian territory on which no state recognizes Israel's sovereignty over it.
[ad_2]
Source link
