[ad_1]
We called on Arab leaders to take a cautious and firm stance to identify the causes of the weaknesses and imbalances of common Arab action in order to develop approaches to address all the risks and all the risks. challenges.
This call leads us to ask a legitimate question in the Arab street: can we consider Arab citizens as the birth of a new political style in the management of our political relations ?! This question is inspired by what the Arab man expects from the implementation of the resolutions of each Arab summit, whether at the level of the Arab League or regional groupings.
All who follow the comments accompanying the Arab meetings are aware that the expectations of each summit are met or even after the end of the full seven-decade period, when most Arab issues remained open and unresolved, but over time time, they exacerbated these issues and created crises and challenges of others, with more important implications, such as the decision of President Donald Trump to make Jerusalem the eternal capital of Israel and its recognition of the occupied Golan territory as Israeli territory, although all international resolutions and political positions say the opposite.
We will not get much from political achievements as long as we believe that the same is true for fast – changing international relations, and that we have a lot of factual experiences, and that is what we are doing. attention to national action is subject to any other work, especially to the extent that it will be in the interest of those who want to succeed
And because we have an effective national Arab model that works in the interest of its citizens and its country, while giving common attention to Arab action in keeping with the norms of international relations, while at the same time sharing with the Arabs their interests, so that neither one nor the other touch the other and therefore can not be considered the nucleus of the birth of a new Arab system. In a different way in the political process, on the grounds that one of the reasons for the failure of a common Arab action lies in the confusion between what is national and what is right for it. State and between work as a political or geographical group, some sabotaging the interests of other Arab states, once they are let the language and history.
I argue that the Arab approach in the language of interests is the supposed political language, moving away mainly from the traditional emotion based on the unity of religion and religion. history; because we are not the only ones in the world, we have a common history, but there is a specificity for each Arab country, which would push our countries to be more effective. In its political movement at the national level and then coordinate with other Arab countries.
The Arab League is a member of the League of Arab States, but it plays a major role in weakening this political entity in favor of countries threatened with stability, the role of the members of the university being to serve the interests of its members and to deal with the disaster. That the differences between these countries do not rest on the Arab interest, but exceed the national accounts and sometimes even the nationals only in the case of other Arab countries.
No one can ignore that this is one of the reasons for the weakness and obstruction of joint Arab action, which has led to criticism of the Arab League for its inability to find solutions to the problems of its members, so that she has lost confidence in the Arab peoples she is supposed to represent. And because the link between its members, based on emotional things as a whole and not the norms of international interest-based relations, is normal to live in a state of frustration and reluctance and to wait for decisions clear and explicit, and therefore we must find those who spoil the Arab action, even to withdraw from the meeting, The speech did not like him.
The United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia have won the trust of Arab public opinion as both countries worked on national and vital standards in Egypt in 2013 and Yemen in 2015 because they found that Was the best model to defend the national, Arab and international interests of the state.
But the starting point is to focus on the national circle and to have succeeded, even if a small part of the way of modifying the Arab thought in the management of the political files is proportional to the management of the countries.
We will not get much from political achievements as long as we believe that the same is true for fast – changing international relations, and that we have a lot of factual experiences, and that is what we are doing. Attention to national action is subject to any other work, especially to the extent that it will be in the interest of those who want to succeed. This serves humanity.
It is difficult to be really optimistic about the outcome of an Arab meeting if we do not change the way we work collectively. I think that if this method is modified, a large majority will support it!
Source link
