[ad_1]
"Finally … the first drug to have cancer from its roots." The title of this title is repeated in several versions, published and broadcast in several Arab media. Is a title that brings a lot of hope. The hope is what those who struggle with this malignant disease really need. Hey … "Cancer" alone in bulk. Cancer is not one, it is a disease that differs from its origin and growth, and therefore its treatments. It is therefore essential that the drug is magic to be able to eradicate all the cancerous diseases from its germination. This is what logic implies, although logic is not recognized as "magic".
According to the title, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the most trusted body in the world, has approved the treatment of Lauterrettenib. The name of the drug is somewhat confusing in Arabic letters. Publishers of the "good news" have therefore included in their Latin writing, with the brand name "Vitraki". The two names are not important here, and the question is dangerous. Yes, it is without doubt. The information contained in the news is fragmentary, not even sometimes distorted. The translator, in fact, is more of a translator, since the media that processed the information of more than one country in more than one country did not understand that it was a scientific medical complex or intended to turn a blind eye to exciting goals or to make mistakes in Arabization. Interesting news can also be labeled attractive and contained in one of the media, to transfer it to another without verification of the source, repeating error / sin as the first means. The result remains that of misleading and false hopes.
We will not go into the scientific details, but it is necessary to emphasize that the new drug is exclusively intended for cancerous diseases caused by a certain genetic mutation, although this is rare. This is not a magic cure and definitive against "cancer". This must be clear, before it frustrated many people who saw a definite tendency to "a happy conclusion" of their suffering. Translators, editors and anyone who approves the publication and distribution of the report should be held accountable. Professionalism is questioned, as is ethics. The question is: who is responsible for this misinformation and these false hopes?
Misinformation is not new. It is a reality that is not controversial. Nobody understands that this reference is an attempt to justify in any way. To falsely represent those who fight against the malignant disease is a crime and to rekindle false hopes is a major crime. The one who translated, edited, published and broadcast was aware of the panic that ravages these … Fears of destruction. If only those who translated, edited, published and disseminated, would have understood that the false hope of life would destroy them … perhaps more than the malignant disease.
[ad_2]
Source link
