After 10 years of conflict, the municipality of Jeddah settled a dispute with a citizen of the municipality of Leith

In accordance with the directives of the region emir and at the judgment of the Leth Tribunal

Recently, the municipality of Jeddah filed the case of a case that had lasted for ten years between the citizen and the municipality of Al-Leith, after it had carried out illegal evictions in recent years. years. The third displacement failed in the same place after the intervention of the judiciary and the emirate of the region.

The Director General of the Monitoring Agency of Municipal Municipalities of Jeddah Municipality sent a letter confirming that the directives of the Emir of the Mecca region and the decision of the General Court of Al-Lith and certified by the Court of Appeal had been completed. The Municipality will bear the removal errors without legal justification allowing it to remove the properties.

The details of the case indicate that the heirs of Ahmed al-Balkhi lodged a complaint against the municipality of Al-Leith in 1431 after it had removed a wall located on the same ground and that regularly installed stores at the entrance of the province have terminated the compensation of 40 000 riyals,.

In 1438, the municipality returned to delete stores irregularly, followed by a decision issued by the Lith General Court four months ago, proving that the removal of the citizen's heirs.

Khalid al-Balkhi said: "The court told us that the municipality had twice removed the land we owned with a legal instrument, the first one was in 1431, when we received a decision from the Grievance Board aimed at to impose on the municipality a fine commensurate with the value of the property removed.Laith District Court four months ago the application of the entire instrument on the ground and proves the mistake of the second displacement and the restitution of the land.

He added that a directive had been issued a year ago by the Emirate of the region, forcing the concerned parties to apply the court ruling and to yield the land, but had been surprised by the date of the third trip a month ago. This date was postponed due to the intervention of the court, which resulted in fairness and put an end to the withdrawal.

The Commission had previously learned that a committee evaluating a Laith court's problem would begin its work in the coming weeks by evaluating the second phase of the move in 1438 to compensate the heirs for such a move.

He called the heirs of the competent citizen authorities, especially the fight against corruption, control and investigations, the need to investigate the people involved in these illegal removals and hold them responsible according to the system.

---

In accordance with the directives of the region emir and at the judgment of the Leth Tribunal

Recently, the municipality of Jeddah filed the case of a case that had lasted for ten years between the citizen and the municipality of Al-Leith, after it had carried out illegal evictions in recent years. years. The third displacement failed in the same place after the intervention of the judiciary and the emirate of the region.

The Director General of the Monitoring Agency of Municipal Municipalities of Jeddah Municipality sent a letter confirming that the directives of the Emir of the Mecca region and the decision of the General Court of Al-Lith and certified by the Court of Appeal had been completed. The Municipality will bear the removal errors without legal justification allowing it to remove the properties.

The details of the case indicate that the heirs of Ahmed al-Balkhi lodged a complaint against the municipality of Al-Leith in 1431 after it had removed a wall located on the same ground and that regularly installed stores at the entrance of the province have terminated the compensation of 40 000 riyals,.

In 1438, the municipality returned to delete stores irregularly, followed by a decision issued by the Lith General Court four months ago, proving that the removal of the citizen's heirs.

Khalid al-Balkhi said: "The court told us that the municipality had twice removed the land we owned with a legal instrument, the first one was in 1431, when we received a decision from the Grievance Board aimed at to impose on the municipality a fine commensurate with the value of the property removed.Laith District Court four months ago the application of the entire instrument on the ground and proves the mistake of the second displacement and the restitution of the land.

He added that a directive had been issued a year ago by the Emirate of the region, forcing the concerned parties to apply the court ruling and to yield the land, but had been surprised by the date of the third trip a month ago.

The Commission had previously learned that a committee evaluating a Laith court's problem would begin its work in the coming weeks by evaluating the second phase of the move in 1438 to compensate the heirs for such a move.

He called the heirs of the competent citizen authorities, especially the fight against corruption, control and investigations, the need to investigate the people involved in these illegal removals and hold them responsible according to the system.