[ad_1]
Although more than three years have elapsed after the delivery of the instrument of divorce of the wife of a famous millionaire, she is about to reach a hundred years, but the divorcee still has the right to wonder about the mechanism, the method and the delivery of the instrument, according to what she called the age and mental status of her husband and the period she lived with him for several decades. She had a single daughter who could no longer visit her elderly father ever since.
Fatima, divorced, insists on the ambiguity of the divorce and the issuance of documents, medical documents and medical reports to implement the divorce through an agency issued, claiming that the divorced husband suffers from dementia, loss of memory (Alzheimer's) and cognition – as described five years ago – and that proven medical reports are impossible. With him proved the spirit in the divorce process.
Although sources of Okaz have confirmed that the Mecca Court of Appeals upheld the divorce decree issued by the Personal Status Court against Fatima, the divorced woman who appealed the divorce and divorce 'instrument of divorce had confirmed that' Okaz 'adhered to the word of the judiciary through the Supreme Court, A request to open an investigation into the case of' falsification of official documents' – as she l? ;said. She wondered: Does the intention to organize her divorce attempt to seize the funds of her husband and deprive her and her daughter of the wealthy?
Fatima recalled what she called the "Whatsapp message" that broke it back years ago, coming from an unknown number that later turned out to come from A known person, who informed her of the issuance of her divorce certificate by the court, according to a legitimate agency.
She said: "The message was a deadly and devastating blow to me and my daughter, and the source of the strange in that I lived with him in love and happiness in the marital home and that There was no difference between us, but that I spent the last few years as a doctor and a nurse for my husband, who had several successive health problems. And heart disease, not the latest diseases of aging, Alzheimer's and dementia.
She explained that after the letter and the situation of her daughter in a difficult situation, she did not know the circumstances surrounding the divorce process at this age because medical reports prove her mental illness before divorce, how can we divorce ?!
Fatima added: "I have lodged a complaint with the competent authorities for having me subject to a fraud of beneficiaries – as described – may have spun after the divorce after obtaining a lawful attorney – implicating his health. and causing my divorce, in addition to doubts about attempted attempts and yet to be seized money from my daughter's father and deprive us of welfare, and any financial right and our inheritance in case of his death God forbid, especially since he is 100 years old, and that he is considered rich and has a hand extended to all. "
She noted that she had received a final decision authorizing her daughter to visit her father because she had not seen him for three years and the mediators were organizing the visit.
Fatima appealed to the anti-corruption watchdog committee to investigate conflicting medical reports issued by a hospital against her daughter's father, as well as agencies issued by him.
Fatima concluded her story with these words: "We are living in difficult conditions once the monthly expenses have stopped, in addition to the order of the Court of Appeals to pay me confusing sums on the grounds that I was wife of a millionaire. "My husband is incompetent with the evidence I have."
After quarantine .. By court order: the state board manages the funds of the millionaire
Okaz learned that the Mecca Court of Appeal had overturned its earlier decision of provisional seizure of the assets and properties of the old businessman and had ordered the formation of a board of trustees. State composed of several sons and daughters of the forbidden in order to manage its money from real estate and bank balances inside and outside of Saudi Arabia. That the entrepreneur has become a mentally unaccounted minor, being over 100 years old.
The court ordered the council to meet four times a year and make decisions by majority, in order to preserve the rights of their father, to defend his interests and those of his family, to manage, supervise, control and collect his income, to resell, to buy, to collect the price, to award the price, to rent the appraiser, to rent, to collect the rent, to collect the rent, to collect the rent, to collect the rental agreement. The members of the State Council create independent legal agencies or use lawyers to attend the meeting.
According to the verdict (seen by Okaz), the court has highlighted seven bank accounts and a set of real estate deeds for the savvy businessman.
The State Court obliged the Council of State to estimate the necessary expenses and to record all the expenses, in which it notified to the General Authority of the finances the funds of the minors with a copy of the judgment in order to put in implement the state system and monitor the work of the Council of State.
A source of the family for "Okaz": false allegations. Divorce is settled
A source close to the famed millionaire's family, told "Okaz," reported the divorcee, or her daughter, stressing his rejection of what he called the lady's attempts to gain sympathy and influence the Public opinion.
While calling "Okaz" to comment on what was said in the lady's speech, he said that what she had said and filed a complaint completely false, and did not occur.
The source approved the validity of a decision to form a state council composed of four sons of the millionaire and took note of the decision to make a decision allowing the woman's daughter to visit to his father. She said nothing prevented her from visiting her when she wanted to. The source accused the divorced woman of attempting to confuse the family and illegal extortion, according to a written response sent to "Okaz".
The source added that all the problems were solved by law in two years and that the question of divorce was decided in the presence of the person concerned before the competent court and that the subject of the girl was never prevented from seeing his father, and that all his obligations had been considerably increased.
[ad_2]
Source link
