[ad_1]
In his analysis of arbitration cases before the victory
The two Saudi SPORTS referees Mohamed Fouda and Samir Osman confirmed a penalty for Al Hilal, which was not counted in the last breath of the match, especially in the 93rd minute, because defender Al blocked Hilal Salman Al Faraj.
Mohamed Fouda explained that there was no penalty for victory in the 8th minute because Al-Hilal's defender, Ali Al-Balahi, had not touched the hand. The decision of Argentine referee Nestor Bettana to continue playing was the right decision.
He stated that the goal of the second victory in the 77th minute is true and that there is no infiltration of striker Abdul Razzaq Hamdallah as there is more than one Red Crescent player in his area, covering the infiltration.
Arbitration board Mohamed Fouda said that the expulsion of Al Hilal Carillo in the 94th minute was true because he had a behavior that we followed by beating the player of the victory Juliano.
Former referee: Al Hilal was denied a penalty in the 93rd minute
Mahmoud Al-Hamad
previously
2018-12-08
The two Saudi SPORTS referees Mohamed Fouda and Samir Osman confirmed a penalty for Al Hilal, which was not counted in the last breath of the match, especially in the 93rd minute, because defender Al blocked Hilal Salman Al Faraj.
Mohamed Fouda explained that there was no penalty for victory in the 8th minute because Al-Hilal's defender, Ali Al-Balahi, had not touched the hand. The decision of Argentine referee Nestor Bettana to continue playing was the right decision.
He stated that the goal of the second victory in the 77th minute is true and that there is no infiltration of striker Abdul Razzaq Hamdallah as there is more than one Red Crescent player in his area, covering the infiltration.
Arbitration board Mohamed Fouda said that the expulsion of Al Hilal Carillo in the 94th minute was true because he had a behavior that we followed by beating the player of the victory Juliano.
The last spring
The time now is 08:47 PM
In his analysis of arbitration cases before the victory
The two Saudi SPORTS referees Mohamed Fouda and Samir Osman confirmed a penalty for Al Hilal, which was not counted in the last breath of the match, especially in the 93rd minute, because defender Al blocked Hilal Salman Al Faraj.
Mohamed Fouda explained that there was no penalty for victory in the 8th minute because Al-Hilal's defender, Ali Al-Balahi, had not touched the hand. The decision of Argentine referee Nestor Bettana to continue playing was the right decision.
He stated that the goal of the second victory in the 77th minute is true and that there is no infiltration of striker Abdul Razzaq Hamdallah as there is more than one Red Crescent player in his area, covering the infiltration.
Arbitration board Mohamed Fouda said that the expulsion of Al Hilal Carillo in the 94th minute was true because he had a behavior that we followed by beating the player of the victory Juliano.
window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({ appId : 636292179804270, autoLogAppEvents : true, xfbml : true, version : 'v2.10' }); FB.AppEvents.logPageView(); };
(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "http://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));
[ad_2]
Source link