[ad_1]
Written by Ayman Mohamed:
(In Europe, they play 4- 3- 3- 1 in Latin America 4- 3- 3). A sentence that he told my family and still rings in my ears, and what I saw in the Nacional games is far from what is in Al-Ahly.
Lasarte has been trying hard to develop the second midfielder to get closer to the goal and this has clearly emerged with Karim Nedved, but the crisis of any analyst with any coach is his ability to adapt abilities players in absence, and under the (globalization) of football, which allows everyone to know the latest There are more red lines to criticize a coach.
It is true that training is not an analysis, but there are very very simple particles that do not need to be inferred in engineering. For example, Hossam el-Badri, a former coach, did his job with Red Fort.
Before resigning, Badri's return is not at all on the table, but I will deduct what he did at the beginning as an artistic part, and not as an appointment for the return of the coach's name to Ahli.
Does Disaber see a genius or does he offer something different from what he's offering to my family?
The list of pyramids is filled with players who have offensive freedom, but who are disorganized in terms of defense, but the secret of the team's superiority, even with Diaz, was in a player named Eric Traore.
Traoré is a model similar to what Nedved tried to make Al Ahli, the second defensive midfielder, to turn into a winger and attacker, and to choose good places to break through.
In short, Traoré plays football in defense and on offense, at the same time as he scores a goal. Ahmed Ali took his place at the far post. Let's go back to the starting point.
With Martin Jol or Fathi Mabrouk, relying on the 4–2-3-1, which requires the enlargement of the leading edges, the wings played on the lines and the lap, a phrase that does not always repeat successfully and the player in the penalty box is not enough to score each time. He has trouble scoring goals.
Azzaro must keep the goalkeeper out of his own goal and the ball is in a motion to touch and come from the parties because the angles of his foot correspond to the corners of his body. I have the impression of explaining a physics lesson and not a performance analysis of the players.
Ahli depends entirely on the parties and the opposite wing does not join even if he joined will do that Ramadan Sobhi to the border of the penalty area, rather than pay directly, as he l & rsquo; had done in front of Ghazl Mahalla a few years ago to even, at the time of the assassin tried to absorb the ball and dribble as usual. The ball was lost in vain.
What did Hossam Badri do?
Walid Suleiman and Moamen Zakaria were present in the Ahli squad with Yul or Badri, but the latter rehired them to become one, as I indicated in the analysis of his match with the sub-teams. processors, to move closer to Moamen Zakaria's AML and Walid Suleiman's AMR.
What is the difference between my place Suleiman and Moamen with Badri and Hussein Shahat and Ramadan Sobhi with Lasarti?
Few meters
To better imagine, the Walid and Zakaria squares in the footsteps of the repair area and the squares Ramadan and Hussein in the footsteps of the petition. Does this concern you?
Of course, the presence of players next to the spearhead creates for the playmaker multiple options, either play for the three players, or exploit the parts of the stadium that quickly move backwards and during the distribution of the players. balls in the penalty area, there remains the quality of the ball and the efficiency of the players who hit the goal.
The above has nothing to do with training, but is closely related to the analysis. I have always called for the presence of clubs and teams in a specialized team, even if the manager and his team ensure the task of the Egyptian fixed performance analyst in the clubs to save time and avoid wasting time . It's time to count on the players (that's their maximum). Or just start developing them.
Hani receives the ball and moves "Qfsh" blatantly in the way Mido (give me the ball) but Hani ignores him and therefore, he lacks awareness of the fact that Hani chooses to play singles so tactical.
Another simple example: after talking about the players, the ball and the time … things do not need a great coach, but they need to know the players more than the lines of his hands.
To know the extent of the disaster flirting with Azzaro, he disavowed it, although Azzaro said the dull historical scorer Ahli at this point. They came back to talk about tactical things, including hiring Ajayi as a spearhead, which has been mentioned many times here.
And who was talking about winning the league is more important than anything and that the pleasure of football is a secondary thing next to the victory, what will soon come to mind after a while and ask: where the performance? And where is football?
Our crisis is that we do not see the crisis, so you will find a similar issue to an article at the press conference that will leave my family excited about a more logical answer:
Who won the league?
If you clearly see the crisis, I asked Ahli 's coach:
Why suffer Ahli wings in front of big teams? Why does Ahli create such difficult opportunities? Do you see yourself responsible for any of the above?
Smart questions do not put you in conflict with the manager and at the same time compel him to reveal what he did not want and that he is relatively comfortable because you have made a partner and not the only one responsible.
This applies to the departments! Some criticize the administration of Khatib, although it adopts the same approach as the Josep Maria Bartimio administration in Barcelona and the Uli Onis administration in Bayern Munich.
Winning the league forgives his mistakes to the coach. Result: Barcelona lost the Cup and the Champions League, Bayern lost the Super and the Champions League, stumbled at the start of the Bundesliga and Al-Ahli came out of Africa and the Cup.
Mistakes in football are one world, be it administrative or technical. Carry the consequences of the decision with a winning coach and at the same time, you may find yourself on another circuit related to another style of management followed by Constantine in Sion, Zambarini in Palermo and Murtaza Mansour in Zamalek (change of the rules). coach as long as you are not satisfied with the performance).
Finally, my family is almost finished, but will the mistake happen again with the next coach, as with Yol, Mabrouk and others?
There are no bets in football, but there is a well-known project:
You can come to Conte and Mourinho during the first season, then Sari, Allegri or Ancelotti.You can be more patient.You can sign with Klopp.You can be calmer and more confident.Take Pep Guardiola, trust him until the end, and bring you what you dream of. .
In the end, analysis in football is a science and a vision, whether it is owned or not.
Source link
