[ad_1]
The Helsinki Summit comes at a time when many US and Western sanctions are being imposed on Russia because of its annexation of Ukrainian Crimea nearly three years ago, through the use of of the armed force. Not only that, there are ongoing investigations into Russian intervention in the recent US presidential elections, which have confirmed congressional committees in addition to assessments of US intelligence services, Moscow's involvement in a direct intervention for to influence Donald Trump. Britain and Western European countries, as well as the United States, imposed additional sanctions after Moscow poisoned a former double client and his daughter with nerve gas, which worsened relations between the two countries. This is in addition to the position of Russia and Putin in favor of the Syrian regime's President, Bashar al-Assad, who allowed Moscow, along with Tehran, to save the Syrian regime from the inevitable downfall and even reinforce its authority over most of Syrian territory. "
The Russian-American researcher at the Brookings Institution in Washington, Eliana Polyakova, believes that the Kremlin has pushed and insisted that the summit be held for months., Especially that Russia will benefit from many sides, including:
1 opportunity for Putin To also appear equitably with the President of the United States to discuss the most important issues in the world.Russia is waiting for Trump's warm words to his Russian counterpart better than the words that he described in its NATO allies.
2 The Russians believe that it is possible to make big profits at the Trump meeting, as was the case at the Singapore summit. -Korean Kim Jong-un, in which Trump made free concessions, such as stopping military exercises with South Korea.The Russians have a lot to gain, and it is unclear what Trump can get.
3 The Russia has some documents to put pressure on Iran, both in terms of the Syrian crisis and the record of the nuclear deal. Mr Trump can withdraw American troops from Syria as he has promised and repeated this desire on several occasions. This is related to pressure reports from Middle East allies, such as Israel, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Ukraine can be sacrificed to the detriment of targets in Syria.
4 Trump Putin shares some hostility towards NATO.
* The open door policy, whereby new members of Russia's neighboring countries, formerly allied by a military alliance under the banner of the Warsaw Pact, could be admitted.
US troops withdrawn or reduced
* The suspension of economic sanctions imposed on Russia
The opinion of the Russian ambassador in Washington
The Russian ambassador in Washington Washington, Anatoly Antonov, in a TV interview of the network "Russia Today" on the summit of Helsinki J, that "the meeting between the two presidents will strengthen the bilateral relations between the two countries and will help deal with the threats global ". "It is impossible to eliminate all the obstacles to our cooperation, but some progress can be made on a number of bilateral, regional and international issues," Antonov said. "If Washington treats Moscow with respect and full adherence, both countries can find a solution to all outstanding issues," he said.
On the other hand, a former US diplomat who spoke to the "New Arab" At the Helsinki summit, these advances on either or both of these issues become highly questionable , with the exception of the Syrian crisis, on which the parties can hear and progress in one way or another. The strong polarization of the political climate in Washington and the growing distance between the Democratic and Republican parties have made it difficult to set clear priorities for Washington on many issues. Washington's traditional allies, Egyptians, Turks, Saudis, Emirati and even Israelis have resorted to Moscow and Putin. And the problems of these countries are causing discord and discord in Washington, at a time when the dependence of the Arab countries vis-à-vis Washington on a broad coordination with Moscow on the prices of gas and energy sources. oil was increasing.
"
" Russia has papers through which it can put pressure on Iran, both on the Syrian crisis and on the record of the nuclear agreement
"
The American diplomat has long served in embassies in his country in the Middle East, that "there is nothing that Washington can lose in the Syrian crisis Rayya, like Iraq , Libya and Algeria, not all countries fall within the circle of American influence for decades, and was under Soviet influence. See their armies and weapons systems, the whole of Russia, we never have Syria to lose it and hand it to the Russians, as some claim. "
The researcher from the Atlantic Center and the former adviser to former US President, US member Barack Obama, about Syria, Frederick Hoff, that Putin is trying to supplement "the Deal of the Syrian Century "with Trump." Putin could try to persuade Trump to withdraw US troops from northern Syria, released by US forces and their Kurdish and other allies from control of an organization pro-American, and if that is the case, it will increase the control of Assad and his Iranian allies. Syrian territory. "Trump may be thrilled by the Russian proposal that justifies the victory against the organization" Da "ash, which enters the US efforts to end it in its fourth year, Trump might want to Declare a decisive victory by stating that it is not necessary to its military presence in Syria.American confusion about the purpose of the presence in Syria, as a conflict between the goal of countering the threat of terrorism. Iranian influence on the one hand, and the goal of eliminating the "dashing." A study released by the Congressional Research Center in late May on US-Iran relations revealed that "One of the most important goals of Washington in Syria is to limit the Iranian influence." The study notes that "the speech of former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on Washington's strategy towards Syria on January 17 confirmed the need for r two thousand American soldiers to remain in Syrian territory for an indefinite period in order to counter the Iranian influence in Syria. Tehran's desire to establish a Shia crescent extending from Iran to the shores of the Mediterranean. "Despite this, Trump promptly demanded the withdrawal of the Syrian armed forces.The Washington targets, according to the previous study, have not changed with respect to" the Washington agreements with Moscow on the reduction tensions in the southwestern regions of Syria, where Iranian allies, like Hezbollah, are moving away from the Israeli border. "In his testimony before the House Foreign Relations Committee last March, US Chief of Staff General Joseph Fotel stressed that "the tasks of the remaining forces in Syria are primarily aimed at preventing the repression of an oppressive organization. Trump's desire to withdraw all US troops from Syria as soon as conditions permit, but this contradicts what State Secretary for Foreign Affairs Mike Pompeo said in a speech to the Heritage Foun in Washington on May 21, in which he stressed that "Iran should withdraw all forces under Iranian military command from all over Syria."
US diplomat: Syria has never been with us for the loss
"
" Iran attaches great importance to its relations with Russia. "For Tehran, Russia is an important player in the Security Council by the right of veto, Russia was one of the signatories of the nuclear agreement with Tehran three years ago, and remains engaged L & # 39; The support of Russia and Iran for Bashar al-Assad's regime in Syria adds an additional boost to their relationship, which Russia considers important for a number of reasons, including their joint confrontation with Sunni terrorist forces. According to the study of the Congressional Research Service.The study supports the so-called "troubling official circles of economic relations of Tehran and Moscow, but the military cooperation between them, working together to support the regime of Bashar al-Assad in Syria, worries American circles. "
Congressional leaders not to engage in armed conflict in the Middle East require a US military presence on the ground, a dilemma which did not end with two Washington wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, the Russian intervention to change the thinking of some of these leaders. While the Pentagon recognizes the motives of Russia's intervention to protect one of its international allies while its international isolation increases following the Ukrainian crisis, which results in severe and costly Western sanctions affecting the Russian interior and damaging its economy, Russia becomes a central player. In a crisis that Washington thought Moscow was far from being. The Pentagon is also aware of the loss of large classical arms markets in Russia, such as Iraq and Libya, and the maintenance of a major arms market, such as Syria, has become a important interest for the Russian arms companies. Russia also aims to deepen military cooperation with Iran, which has begun to modernize its arsenal of conventional weapons obsolete after the signing of the nuclear deal. Indeed, major deals have been made while Tehran receives its deposits in the West, which exceed 100 billion dollars. Russian air strikes are an opportunity for Moscow to examine the last of its military factories on a real battlefield.
Although the Russian military intervention poses a major challenge to the Pentagon, US defense experts recognize that the current war is the least alternative. At the same time, recent developments have introduced the Pentagon into a major dilemma: the need for military coordination with the Russian side so as not to cause unintentional and costly accidents. With Assad's control over the southwest, which includes the city of Daraa, cradle of the Syrian revolution, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu went to Moscow on Thursday to discuss the need for the militia Iranian to stay at tens of kilometers of "border" Syrian, while the same day arrived Iranian envoy Ali Akbar Velayati. Some in Washington fear that Trump would admit Putin's annexation of Crimea in exchange for promises to reduce the Russian presence in Syria and move it away from the Israeli "border."
The specter of Russian interference in the elections