Does the referee and the "mouse" against Real Madrid against Ajax?



[ad_1]
<div id = "firstBodyDiv" data-bind-html-content-type = "article" data-bind-html-compile = "article.body" data-first-article-body = "

One of the most controversial arbitration awards among the masses is the abolition of the rule for a purpose Ajax In the first half, after the use of video technology, become the first goal to be canceled by this technology in the history of the tournament.

Reactions were different about the validity of the objective or not, which prompted the tournament's official report to publish an explanation as to why the target was not counted, which again showed the exact repetition that his cancellation was the right decision.

Then came the case of infiltration of the Ajax striker Doosan TadicWhat was banned by the referee from a breakthrough that would have become a serious exception for the goalkeeper of the Royal Team, although it was before the midline when the ball started, which means that the law of infiltration is not applicable to him.

The third controversial case was the goal real Madrid Decisive before the last minutes, when he showed a match-return between the Ajax player Frinky De Young Real Madrid Player Lucas Vázquez, Fell on the first track and asked for an error, but the referee did not stop the match that ended with the goal of the win.

The crowd differed a lot from this situation, but the recovery showed that the players had gathered and that de Jong was perhaps the one who had tried to prevent Vázquez from participating in the attack, but his fall and its request for error raised questions as to the eligibility of the goal.

With a 2-1 victory in Amsterdam, the reigning champions nearly made it to the quarter-finals of the Champions League despite poor performances, and some believe that Ajax deserved that victory.

During the first video technology experiment in Europe, commentators said that Alfar had stopped in the Real Madrid line, referring to "A long history of taking advantage of arbitration mistakes in the tournament ", Which peaked 13 times.

">

One of the most controversial arbitration decisions was the cancellation of Ajax's first half goal after the use of video technology, thus becoming the primary goal to be eliminated from the game. Tournament history.

Reactions were different about the validity of the objective or not, which prompted the tournament's official report to publish an explanation as to why the target was not counted, which again showed the exact repetition that his cancellation was the right decision.

It was followed by an incursion at the Ajax Dusan Tadic striker, who had been banned by the referee from a breakthrough that would pose a serious threat to the royal goalkeeper, even though he was not the only one. He was in front of the midfield at the beginning of the match.

The third controversial case was the decisive goal of Real Madrid, a few minutes before the end, when the return match between Ferenc de Jong (Ajax) and Lucas Vázquez (Real Madrid) caused a foul, but the referee did not make a mistake. did not stop the match which ended with the goal of the win.

The crowd differed a lot from this situation, but the recovery showed that the players had gathered and that de Jong was perhaps the one who had tried to prevent Vázquez from participating in the attack, but his fall and its request for error raised questions as to the eligibility of the goal.

With a 2-1 victory in Amsterdam, the reigning champions nearly made it to the quarter-finals of the Champions League despite poor performances, and some believe that Ajax deserved that victory.

In the first video experience in Europe, commentators said that Alfar had stopped at Real Madrid, citing "a long history of taking advantage of referee mistakes" in the championship, which was crowned 13 times.

[ad_2]
Source link