[ad_1]
For nearly a decade Turkey has grown accustomed to interfering in all distractions and incidences in several Arab countries in which it has political and military influence through the “Muslim Brotherhood” group, as Ankara seeks to through him to establish himself as an official sponsor of a particular country, as is currently the case in parts of Syria, Iraq, Libya, Qatar, Somalia and other countries in which the terrorist group is active.
Attempts by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to see himself as a remote control device for several Arab countries have at times failed, but despite this he is so far trying to repeat his failed experiences and trying to pass these countries off as s ‘they were on-screen television channels from the door of economic investment, especially in countries. In which he has no political or military support.
This political plan is evidenced by what Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlüt Çavuşolu has repeatedly confirmed that there are tens of thousands of Turkish investors and workers in Lebanon, for example, so that on his penultimate visit to the capital Beirut, he said their number was around 50,000. This signifies the presence of a large Turkish community in Lebanon, at a time when Ankara and Tehran are rushing to control it completely. .
It must be remembered that Ankara imposes restrictions on economic investment on its lands, including the presence of a Turkish partner for every foreign investor, but other capitals do not treat Ankara the same, which means that it There is no Lebanese partner for every Turkish investor in Beirut or other Arab capitals, which leads to the lack of effective oversight of Turkish projects, often linked to their country’s intelligence.
Therefore, Lebanese authorities and others in Arab countries must impose restrictions on these businesses, including those in which a partner of their citizens is present, and impose partial control at least over these investments and their actual activities, especially since there is no guarantee among these investors that they will not support terrorist movements with the aim of destabilizing them. The countries they are in to fulfill Erdogan’s orders, who can easily use them and move them as needed.
Indeed, it is not enough for Arab countries to take into account the security aspect of Turkish investment, but also to take an alternative for the investor and Turkish products. If Arab capitals were to intervene in internal crises in Turkey, the first thing Erdogan would do would be to expel Arab capitals. He can also use the economy as a new weapon against these countries in the future, and he can easily detain Arab businessmen or those who do their business and prevent Turkish exports from reaching the Arab world.
In this regard, it is necessary to recall the experience of the Kurdistan region in Iraq, whose food security is totally dependent on Ankara. During the failed referendum for Iraqi independence, led by former President Masoud Barzani more than 3 years ago, Erdogan threatened, speaking to residents of the region, to close the border post that connects the Turkey to the area and let them starve and thirst!
Therefore, the Arab countries should avoid being totally or partially dependent on Turkey economically, and they should also impose restrictions on Turkish investors and their projects on their lands, alongside the gradual withdrawal of the capital of their citizens from ‘Ankara. Without it, Turkish investment in the Arab world could turn into a time bomb that Erdogan detonates from a distance whenever he chooses.
Source link
