[ad_1]
Al-Marsad Journal: Arbitration expert Muhammad Foda refuted the arbitration cases in the Al-Ahly and Al-Ittihad match held last night, Thursday, in the 18th round of the League of the Prince Mohammed Bin Salman Cup for professionals, which ended in a positive tie with one goal for each team.
Parcel crate
“Fouda” began his analysis of the match from the third minute of the match, which witnessed a violation by Al-Ahly Vijsa player, stating he deserved to be sent off for trying to harm to Al-Ittihad player Romarinho after crushing his back foot, but the referee, Muhammad Al-Howaish, was far from the situation and it is assumed. Let the video judge summon him and draw his attention to this case, which requires at least a yellow card if it is not a direct red card.
He continued, “Al-Fouda”, in the eighth minute the ball hit the blocking wall and hit the hand of the defender of Al-Ahly, and the hand was in the body and the continuation of play was a judicious decision of the referee. .
Two shots on goal for Alitihad did not count
In the 35th minute, “Foda” declared, “Al-Howaish” was supposed to take a penalty in favor of Al-Ittihad after Al-Ahly player Mohammed Al-Fateel slipped to the ground and blocked the player in ‘Al-Ittihad Sbeit.
In the 60th minute, “Fouda” explained that Al-Ittihad striker Romarinho fell in the penalty area and that a penalty should have been taken after Abdullah Hassoun, Al-Ahly’s player, intercepted Rosarinho with body and hand until he fell. , but the arbitrator didn’t consider it too because he was far from the case and didn’t see it correctly.
Warning cases not counted by the referee
In the 54th minute, “Fouda” declared that there had been a violation of Saud Abdel Hamid, the Al-Ittihad player, in which the deal was a direct free kick with a yellow card.
In the 67th minute, I witnessed a violation by Al-Ahly player, and Al-Ittihad player Abdul-Ilah Al-Maliki filed a violation, but the referee left the match to continue.
Source link
