[ad_1]
It seems that the story of artist Rania Youssef with the statements of the breech and the thrilling veil is not yet over, as Haitham Abbas, the lawyer for Iraqi journalist Nizar Al-Faris, released a statement regarding the take of legal action against the artist. Rania Youssef, who announced a few days ago that her client had been sued after a famous media interview, in which the artist spoke of the veil and behind of actresses, which stirred public opinion against her
“Abbas” said in a statement that he was about to take legal action against “Youssef”, accusing him of “defamation and falsification of facts”, after his episode with his client, which had sparked controversy in recent weeks, and that she has taken legal action against him, accusing him of deducting parts of Meeting.
He added: “As everyone knows, journalist Nizar Al-Faris welcomed artist Rania Youssef on his show (With Al Faris), broadcast on Iraqi channel Al-Rasheed, and the journalist and his team have moved to Cairo. , after the artist. coordinated the filming location for them in one of the most prestigious hotels in Cairo and during the preparation of the filming.The artist expressed his full agreement on all matters, except one related to his personal life, which was respected by journalist Nizar Al-Faris Indeed, the episode was filmed, and after its end, the artist expressed his happiness with the work and the dialogue and requested his presence in Baghdad from as possible and quickly the situation changed.
He went on to say: “Journalist Nizar Al-Faris was surprised by the actress’ attack on her person and the undermining of her professionalism, and this is the result of what artist Rania Youssef was the victim of an attack on social networking sites, and numerous lawsuits were set up against her, which is not closely or remotely linked to journalist Nizar Al-Faris and what the artist is doing is on display in response to her response during the dialogue, and artist Rania Youssef went on to and stamped the journalist Nizar Al-Faris is accused of extracting parts of the dialogue and compiling these clips to change the meaning of what ‘she said, or whatever artist Rania Youssef wanted, which was true of journalist Nizar Al-Faris. media honor killing and violates all conventions and ethics of the profession, but the truth is that journalist Nizar Al-Fares did not err in the rights of artist Rania Youssef, and no part dialogue was not completely cut off, on the contrary, when the artist Rania Youssef asked to remove the question of the veil and her answer, the answer was his concern for her and what she suffered from the attack ” .
He concluded: “Considering what happened to artist Rania Youssef and his constant attack on the media person, Nizar Al-Faris, and the serious material and moral damage that resulted, he did not had no choice but to resort to the Egyptian. judicial, to demand his legal right, and he will present all documents before him to determine the validity of what Artist Rania Youssef is claiming.
Bayan Youssef Rania Youssef
Star Rania Youssef issued a press release about her meeting with Iraqi television station Al-Rasheed, which led some lawyers to sue her for contempt of religion, and held a session on February 21 to review the first session of it. trial.
The text of the declaration reads as follows: “It is customary for each profession to have a strict and clear law which regulates it with specific provisions and articles, but we know that each profession has an additional human honor pact. rigid articles of law. , because the code of honor amounts to the shadow of the law, and the code of media honor obliges media professionals to respect their guests and respect their desire to be informed as they wish, especially if these guests are famous and private company. “
Rania added: “In fact, I had made the decision to limit or temporarily refrain from press or television interviews, especially those that depend on the posting of the video recording via social media, seeking more views, such as the “trending” culture which often requires cutting and modifying the content of the speech. And showing compiled excerpts from the “Promo” dialogue gives false meaning and distorts the truth of what has been said all over the place. long dialogue, but after the insistence of an Iraqi broadcaster – with all my love and gratitude from the dear Iraqi people and the Iraqi public.
Rania continued, “This broadcaster has sent many urgent messages that my meeting with his channel on New Years Eve will be a big victory for him in his line of work, and that the channel does not have the budget to charge him. the sums that public figures and artists receive, and after constant insistence, I agreed to hold the meeting without any. “In return for my money and the appreciation of the large Iraqi public, but during the dialogue, j I was surprised by some questions that we might call “thick questions.”
And Rania Youssef continued, “One of that quality is a question about the clothing of female artists in general at film festivals, and I responded with a sarcastic response that was cut out of context, and I said confirming that I’m laughing and not talking seriously, and that in the first minute of segment 2.37 to 2.39, I’m trying to joke with you all the time. “” Be a buzzar with you “and that’s included in the full version of the 50 minute episode, then I completed the answer.
Rania continued with her statement, “My use of the noble Quranic verse was not.” As for the grace of your Lord, it happened “This has nothing to do with the context of the answer on the beauty of the artists or their clothes I said the text after my martyrdom of this verse in the section next 3.17 to 3.22, I didn’t mean in the body, I mean in life, when you still have a sweet need, show it to people, “I mean in life in general, not the body.”
And she added: “As to the third point that aroused the feelings of those who heard the fragmentary dialogue from its context, my response was to a question about ‘the veil’, so I personally said I don’t think so. that I will wear the hijab, and this is a purely personal matter that has nothing to do with issuing fatwas in religion to others, and quoting what we were. let’s all see, from old photos and celebrations from the 1960s, that it was rare to see a woman wearing a headscarf, and yet Egyptian society was conservative and open without looking at any shape or garment, and this opinion remains. a personal opinion that has nothing to do with the origin of religion, so to say this opinion or any other is not an invitation. It does not take anything with it towards those who wear the hijab or those who have decided not to wear it. What has been said remains in the space of purely nobody’s opinion lle. “
Rania demanded that not everyone be judged on a hasty decision based on fragmentary and distorted images of the context of the dialogue, which called on her lawyer to immediately start taking all legal steps in Egypt and Iraq and d ” inform the competent authorities and the Supreme Court. Advice on the deception and distortion of my dialogue, and I also apologize, I sincerely apologize to the Egyptian people, especially to anyone who has seen or heard this fragmentary dialogue and who thought these meanings came from me.
Rania concluded her statement: “So I saw that I am writing this statement for the dear audience of my beloved country, Egypt, with which I always guard myself against anything related to art and culture. Egyptian artist with the aim of deliberate distortion, and from there I call on all professional media professionals to unite to protect the prestige of speech. This is the only bridge for the artist to reach the consciousness of his fans. “
Source link