Is the injustice of victory against disciplinary sanctions? Legal opinions respond

Citizen – Mohamed Sama

The criticism was directed at the Discipline and Ethics Committee of the Saudi Football Federation because of the disciplinary sanctions imposed on the Al-Nasr club, its official spokesman Abdullah bin Zanan and the club's general secretary Mohammed Al-Mashaal. .

The Discipline Committee approved the penal sanction imposed on Abdullah bin Zanan with a fine of 300,000 riyals and prevented him from practicing any football activity for one year.

The discipline also fined Mohammed al-Mashaal 100,000 rials and was prevented from participating in any football activity for six months.

Legal opinions illustrate

The lawyers asked to speak about the legality of the sanction imposed by the committee of discipline to the victory. "The Discipline Committee recognizes the counterfeiting of the victory and the General Secretary as a violation and punishes him for a disproportionate moral content with respect to the offense,

"Discipline" did not mention the time in the official statement of punishment, indicating that the document had been falsified without his knowledge and punishing him for his insults.

In the same context, the legal framework Khaled Abu Rashid said: The sanctions against Al-Nasr's spokesman and the club's general secretary are inaccurate and incomprehensible from a legal point of view. His speech has not gone over nor has he brought charges to anyone.

Khalid Abu Rashed said: "Of course, if the club's spokesperson and club secretary seem to have been appointed by the president of the victory to talk about it, and I see that the punishment against them is vague, little clear and legally unfounded.

"The only valid penalty against the victory is the mistake made by the club during the presentation of the document or the protest note, but the rest is not true," Abu Rashid said.