[ad_1]
What is the difference between President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi's appeal to Egyptians to reduce their weight and similar calls in Britain, America, Mexico and elsewhere? Egypt occupies a very advanced position in all categories of obesity in the world, which also places it in an advanced position for noncommunicable diseases such as hypertension, heart disease and diabetes .
However, although we have agreed on the importance of the issue and the positive fact that the State, with international cooperation, is providing a comprehensive health survey (100 million people campaign). In its setting free C virus and noncommunicable diseases are treated, but we still have substantial differences with international policies.
The first is to blame. Sisi addressed people at the level of individual responsibility: the Egyptians (those neglected neglected) did not wish to increase their weight, so they had to exercise as they were addressing themselves to a zombie people. While the cause of obesity in Egypt lies in the wrong kind of food, but not in abundance, the poor are the ones who do not find a substitute for saturated fat intake and who fill their needs with the carbohydrates the cheaper. Ironically, Egyptian cuisine has always been associated with famine, as has the Egyptian peasantry with poverty. So bread was the main Egyptian food. There are also in Egypt spreads such as Al-Kushary, which no longer contains different types of starches, and sometimes eats kashiri with bread!
On the other hand, the higher the price of healthy foods, especially when it comes to fresh fruits and vegetables, the higher the price. The solution to the problem is different: for example, the Minister of Education, Tareq Shawqi, did not use the subway the full distance he was traveling, instead of walking. President Sissi also pointed out another solution, namely that the media cease to welcome overweight guests, in a context consistent with his clear belief that everything can be solved using the media that he considers as omnipotent, whatever the reality.
On the other hand, democratic states know that responsibility lies primarily with the government, as well in public policies that enhance the economic and educational status of citizens, they can buy healthy food, or in policies specifically designed to combat the health of people. ;obesity. For example, British schools have launched a "Daily Mille" campaign since 2006, in which students travel to the outside. School meals have also been the subject of several stages of improvement, depending on health needs: a minimum of vegetables or salad a day, including three different types of fruits and vegetables each week , as well as reduced sugars and baked goods Fried foods and juices that have a maximum volume of 150 milligrams, while low-fat milk is served daily. Finally, the British Public Health Commission examined the determinants of government intervention to compel pizzas to change their ingredients or size to reduce their caloric intake rather than the previous voluntary appeal.
This is happening in a country where people already have large areas of free parks, cheap local clubs and where their economic level allows them to buy healthy foods and protect them through multiple social security systems. .
In the absence of these aspects, the discourse of the bodies of citizens becomes debatable and not welcomed, authoritarian states dominate the bodies, especially the specifics of the human being that can be adapted by adapting them, and we have witnessed experiences that do not start with the Nazi campaigns against obesity, and do not end up forcing his ministers to appear Government television by doing exercise!
The irony is that diets that respect the "weight" of the moral masses, as public opinion and voting in the fund, are also responsible for the weight of their bodies.
However, although we have agreed on the importance of the issue and the positive fact that the State, with international cooperation, is providing a comprehensive health survey (100 million people campaign). In its setting free C virus and noncommunicable diseases are treated, but we still have substantial differences with international policies.
The first is to blame. Sisi addressed people at the level of individual responsibility: the Egyptians (those neglected neglected) did not wish to increase their weight, so they had to exercise as they were addressing themselves to a zombie people. While the cause of obesity in Egypt lies in the wrong kind of food, but not in abundance, the poor are the ones who do not find a substitute for saturated fat intake and who fill their needs with the carbohydrates the cheaper. Ironically, Egyptian cuisine has always been associated with famine, as has the Egyptian peasantry with poverty. So bread was the main Egyptian food. There are also in Egypt spreads such as Al-Kushary, which no longer contains different types of starches, and sometimes eats kashiri with bread!
On the other hand, the higher the price of healthy foods, especially when it comes to fresh fruits and vegetables, the higher the price. The solution to the problem is different: for example, the Minister of Education, Tareq Shawqi, did not use the subway the full distance he was traveling, instead of walking. President Sissi also pointed out another solution, namely that the media cease to welcome overweight guests, in a context consistent with his clear belief that everything can be solved using the media that he considers as omnipotent, whatever the reality.
On the other hand, democratic states know that responsibility lies primarily with the government, as well in public policies that enhance the economic and educational status of citizens, they can buy healthy food, or in policies specifically designed to combat the health of people. ;obesity. For example, British schools have launched a "Daily Mille" campaign since 2006, in which students travel to the outside. School meals have also been the subject of several stages of improvement, depending on health needs: a minimum of vegetables or salad a day, including three different types of fruits and vegetables each week , as well as reduced sugars and baked goods Fried foods and juices that have a maximum volume of 150 milligrams, while low-fat milk is served daily. Finally, the British Public Health Commission examined the determinants of government intervention to compel pizzas to change their ingredients or size to reduce their caloric intake rather than the previous voluntary appeal.
This is happening in a country where people already have large areas of free parks, cheap local clubs and where their economic level allows them to buy healthy foods and protect them through multiple social security systems. .
In the absence of these aspects, the discourse of the bodies of citizens becomes debatable and not welcomed, authoritarian states dominate the bodies, especially the specifics of the human being that can be adapted by adapting them, and we have witnessed experiences that do not start with the Nazi campaigns against obesity, and do not end up forcing his ministers to appear Government television by doing exercise!
The irony is that diets that respect the "weight" of the moral masses, as public opinion and voting in the fund, are also responsible for the weight of their bodies.
[ad_2]
Source link
