NASA warns: an asteroid of 30 nuclear bombs approaching the Earth



[ad_1]

Scott Galway, professor of economics at New York University, said Facebook's CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, was the most dangerous person in the world, and Bloomberg said Zuckerberg had incredible power.

According to Galway, Facebook integrates messaging services via its various platforms, including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp and Messenger, all of which operate on the same "technical infrastructure", while customers will still be able to use each application. For individual correspondence, it is the Zuckerberg plan that will be implemented by the end of this year or early 2020, according to Sputnik.

According to Galway, Zuckerberg's risk stems from his control of this merger over a single communications network of 2.7 billion people worldwide.

According to Facebook data, more than 2.7 billion people use at least one of the company's proprietary applications every month and more than 2.1 billion people use Facebook Messenger, Instagram or WhatsApp every day on average.

"The idea that we have a person who decides on 2.7 billion network algorithms is scary, whatever his intentions," Galway said in an interview with CNBC. "Different voices and perspectives help keep the validity of the democratic process."

Galway added that the diversity of media and viewpoints was the fundamental guarantee of community balance and emphasized that people should worry about the idea that a single set of Algorithms, controlled by one person (can not be removed from office), will have a significant impact on the derived platform. Thanks to this, billions of Facebook users around the world are consulting their information every day.

The US Department of Justice announced in late July that it was going to open an antitrust review of the biggest tech companies. Although no one has been named, the Wall Street Journal has named companies such as Facebook, Google and Google. Amazon and Apple.

Galway warned that after Zuckerberg's application integration, the company would resist the government's attempts to dismantle Facebook and claim that it would not have been possible without the collapse of the entire system of social network.

Facebook may also argue that, if it is divided into smaller parts, it will not be able to compete with the giants of Chinese technology, such as the Chinese WeChat messaging application, which Galway has called "l & # 39; argument of the national hero "in the economy.

[ad_2]
Source link