[ad_1]
<< Okaz >> learned that the Makkah Criminal Court issued a new decision today (Wednesday) acquitting 13 defendants in the Haram Crane case, including bin Laden’s group. The Judicial Department said during the verdict hearing that nothing appeared to it except what it had conducted and ruled and decided to release a new instrument with its contents and send it. So that the Court of Appeal decides what it sees.
The court ruling said the Meteorological and Environment Agency issued a weather report on the day of the accident and the day before it, which indicated that the wind speed in the Red Sea varied between (1) and (38) kilometers per hour only, and did not include a description of the situation as hurricanes. And so on, which is necessary to exercise caution and prudence, and the ministry did not find in the trial documents that the General Meteorological Authority warned and warned that this disaster would occur, any as the ministry says what happened in Mecca that day may be linked to pandemics and celestial pests that are difficult if not allowed. With it, prudence or prudence are taken, and it is decided by the jurists that the guarantee will fall there and thus the exclusion of the responsibility.
The Court of Appeal had observed 6 notes on the previous acquittal decision, and among the most striking observations were that the fall of the crane is a constant reality and has resulted in deaths and injuries, and that the main accused and others cannot deny it, and that the company responsible for the project and the rest of the defendants are carrying the measures taken to ensure the safety of the huge crane and the safety of visitors to their homes. God forbids his danger and does not pay attention to their justifications presented to the court.
The Court of Appeal insisted on the need to clarify, define and know the tasks of the safety section of the project, since the company in charge of the implementation has an integrated service for monitoring weather fluctuations, which means that ‘She is fully responsible for detecting and forecasting weather conditions and does not need to wait for weather reports according to their arguments in court.
Monitored notes indicated that the failure that caused the crane to fall was due to poor monitoring and communication by project safety officials regarding weather conditions.
The Court of Appeal also followed the response of an official among the defendants that he had not been made aware of the storm outbreak on the day the crane fell, as it occurred on Friday and he was on vacation. Department of Environmental Safety affiliated with the Department of Safety and its role in collecting reports on weather and weather conditions and preparing daily reports, which have not been completed, and which explains the existence of a negligence on the implementing authority, and this requires further discussion from the trial court.
The Court of Appeal approved what was stated in the overturned judgment, which states that the prosecutor does not have the capacity to demand payment of blood money and payment of damages and has nothing to to do with this as it is a private right and the appeals department concludes that what is stated in this part is correct as there is no public prosecution capacity in the request. With special rights.
[ad_2]
Source link
