[ad_1]
Doctors and scientists are working on developing guidelines for cancer survivors as more and more people live for decades after the diagnosis of the disease. An American report suggests, however, that further efforts are needed to improve the quality of medical care for survivors of the deadly disease. More than a decade has passed since the 2006 US National Academy of Medicine published its essential report on cancer survivors, which encouraged patients to be interested in patient care. This report called for changing people's thinking rather than concentrating on oncology. Which last a lifetime due to malignant tumors, surgical operations, treatments and radiation.
In a report published by the National Cancer Institute, researchers said many of the recommendations in the 2006 report had not been fully implemented, despite some progress. "One of the great success stories is the awareness of the challenges facing cancer survivors after treatment, such as intoxication of certain body organs or the effects of cancer," said Dr. Ron Klein, lead author of the report of the Medicare and Medicare Development Center in the United States. Premature aging due to chemotherapy, as well as the effects of surgery and the psychological stress of not knowing if the cancer will recur, as well as the physical burden of treatment that sometimes lasts for long periods or even indefinitely. "Recognizing these challenges, field leaders are encouraging field leaders to develop and test new models of survivor management and to inquire about the quality of care received," he said. he declared by email.
The Klein report states that the National Academy of Medicine's report allowed health care providers to improve service delivery to help patients and their families understand the importance of post-treatment phase. For example, the report recommends that patients obtain a post-survival health plan to assist with periodic examinations and treatment once the tumor is over, but it is not clear to what extent these plans are actually being used or are being used. they improved the results. Part of the problem, according to the new report, is that there are no clear criteria for assessing or improving the quality of health care provided to victims, as most quality measures are focused on oncology rather than helping victims adjust later to their lives.
The new report adds that physicians are not very committed to training health service providers to the recommendations of the Academy regarding survivor care, despite the development of professional and voluntary institutions to develop health care providers. training programs in this regard.
[ad_2]
Source link
