[ad_1]
A Riyadh appeal court ruled that one attorney had been acquitted of threatening a judge in a letter on WhatsApp's application aimed at discouraging him from ruling against his client.
The details of the incident are due to the referral of a judge to a lawyer before the prosecution, accusing him of threatening to send him an SMS via "WhatsApp", for his anger during the procedure.
The verdict of acquittal, according to "Okaz", according to which, after reviewing the letter, did not suggest anything threatening, all reminded the judge that the grievance procedure was in accordance with his procedures and at the same time. intention to complain to other bodies, such as the Supreme Council of the Judiciary.
The court reviewed the correspondence between the judge and the lawyer, which were expressions of welcome and welcome, pointing out that the lawyer had denied any attempt to threaten or influence the judge and had acknowledged the validity of the letter.
She pointed out that the judge had agreed to contact one of the parties via his cell phone and that there was an earlier correspondence due to an earlier relationship at work. He also erred in the telephone communication between the parties and not the other, pointing out that the message and its contents were repeatedly mentioned in the Shariah Council. Or the feast.
[ad_2]
Source link
