[ad_1]
The development of national identities that have taken root, cannot be moved, and the song of (glories) of the past or the dream of the return of Persian or Ottoman colonial rule will not help, because the peoples and countries of the region, and with it, the international community, will face it forcefully.
Arab peoples no longer accept foreign rule under any name, especially religious name. Islam was born and flourished among the Arabs, and the Quran was revealed in the language of the Arabs, and it is they who published and brought it. in different parts of the world, with wisdom and good advice, and if there is any legitimacy for anyone to rule in the name of Islam, it is for the Arabs and not for others. However, the Arabs do not want to dominate anyone, neither in the name of religion nor under any other name.
Erdogan’s Turkey is intervening today militarily in Iraq under the pretext of the presence of the PKK on its territory, and sends its armies to invade Iraq and stay there, and does what it wants under these fragile arguments. And if there are active Labor Party cells in Iraq, and this is not certain, since there have been no attacks against Turkey launched from Iraq, then this mission is a mission Iraqi state, and Turkey should negotiate with the Iraqi state about it, instead. to send his army to occupy Iraqi lands, in flagrant violation of sovereignty, neighborhood values and the development of economic relations between the two countries. It is Iraq’s duty to prevent any military threat emanating from its lands to all neighboring countries, and if there is a threat, then it should be discussed with the Iraqi government, and when bilateral solutions are delayed , then resort to the United Nations. .
Turkey is also interfering in Syria with similar arguments, supporting some forces against others, killing and destroying all those who oppose it, especially the Kurds who have suffered from the oppression of the Syrian regime, and are suffering today. of the Turkish military intervention which imposed them. the forces supporting Turkey over the others. Military or political intervention cannot be justified, regardless of the justifications and justifications, because the State which interferes in the affairs of another State hardly recognizes its sovereignty, or it does not respect this sovereignty. sovereignty, he considers himself rather more empowered than she. to determine its own destiny and choose the political system that governs it.
What if Iraq and Syria are neighbors of the new sultanist state of Erdogan, and there may be forced friction between them and Turkey, and they are forced to face and endure its interventions in their country, so what motivates the dreamy sultan, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, to military intervention in Libya, which is located on another continent and belongs to another nationality and another culture? Are there not behind this intervention aggressive intentions, colonial plans, cultural, political and economic hegemony, not only over Libya, but also throughout the Arab region?
All Arab countries have felt the danger of Turkish intervention in Libya, and in Libya in particular, because it is far from Turkey, its culture, its policies and its problems. If distant countries sensed this danger, what about Egypt, which has national, cultural, geographic, political and economic ties with the country attached to it? The Egyptian feeling of Turkish danger has its objective, patriotic and national causes. Egypt did not seek to dominate Libya, and it was possible in the past, if Colonel Gaddafi tried to enter into a merger unit with Egypt, since he took power in (Al- Fateh of September) in 1969, but the Egyptians, especially during the time of Presidents Anwar Sadat and Hosni Mubarak. They rejected these proposals and insisted on the sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of Libya.
Egypt still supports the territorial integrity of Libya, through its support for the Libyan National Army led by Lieutenant General Khalifa Haftar, which seeks to unify the country and prevent foreign intervention and control of the militias. terrorists on him, and these objectives are legitimate and are in the interest of the Arab world, which wants to see a coherent and stable state in Libya, it is a terrorist group which seeks to destabilize the region.
The Arab position in favor of Egypt is the correct national and patriotic position. Turkey, which has cut off seas and oceans to interfere in the affairs of a distant Arab country, has not come for the security and stability of Libya, nor in order to strengthen the sovereignty of the Libya on its land, or to support Libyan democracy and the Libyan economy, or authority. Legitimacy, not to strengthen Arab unity, but rather for it to gain a foothold in the Arab world by trying to regain its hegemony over the Arab countries freed from this hegemony a century ago. The Arabs were not previously satisfied or convinced with the rule of the Ottoman Empire, and for this reason, they revolted against it during World War I, and sought to establish an Arab state that would take care of the affairs of the Arabs and rid them. of Ottoman arbitrariness.
If Erdogan believes that the Arabs will drink this cup of poison, or that they really “yearn” for the days of the “Ottoman Caliphate”, then he is delusional, and if there are those who are deceiving him in this, he should not. not trust them because they are a misguided few looking for narrow gains. We still remember the tragedies that occurred in the Arab world at the time of this “caliphate” which reigned in the name of Islam, but it did not impose any weight on the Arabs, on civilization, on culture. and originality, when their land was the origin of Islam and the cradle of revelation, and their language was the language of the Koran.
We still remember the stories of our ancestors about the cruelty and greed of this (caliphate), and its crimes, which have a first and not another, against Islam, and the rights of the states and nations that have come together. united, by force, illusion, or sincere intention, under his banner. Perhaps one of the most heinous crimes, which cannot be digested, in any culture, religion or logic, was that the sultan, on the day he took power, killed his brothers, the children of his mother and father, (to protect Islam caliphate from the rivalry of brothers on the throne of the Sultanate)! Nobody knows where the Ottoman sultans and “caliphs” came from with this defamation and tie it to Islam?
The Egyptian reactions are justified, because Erdogan interfered in Egyptian affairs and supported the rule of the Brotherhood in Egypt, and he did not care about the revolution of the Egyptian people against their rule and the release of 30 million dollars. ‘Egyptians, in the biggest protest in history. , demanding the resignation of the Brotherhood. And when he refused and clung to power, contrary to the demands of the majority of the people, the army was forced to take power, responding to the call of millions of Egyptians unhappy with the rule of the Brotherhood, who presented proof after another that he did not belong to Egypt, its culture and its moral position in the Arab and Islamic worlds.
We have no illusions about Erdogan’s intentions and plans in Libya, and all Arabs are aware of his plans and do not believe his justifications. Its support for the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and other Arab countries is based on a basic principle, namely that this movement was created at the beginning, yes from 1928, to protest against the fall of the “Ottoman Caliphate” in 1924 in the hands of the Turks themselves, this caliphate then called the countries of the world by “the sick man of Europe whose goods must be shared before dying”.
If the Turks themselves did not accept this caliphate and considered it out of history and geography, then they overthrew it and established the “Turkish Republic” in its place, then why Erdogan and do his new Ottoman supporters expect the Arabs to welcome him to their country when they see nothing but Turkification, discrimination, backwardness, retreat, arbitrariness and neglect? The reign of the Ottomans was an extension of the dark period following Mongolian control of Baghdad and its overthrow of the Abbasid Caliphate, or what remained of it, and conditions in Arab countries did not improve at all, in no direction, but deliberately neglecting Arab culture, except for a short time during the reign of Governor Medhat Pasha in Iraq., who established an Arab printing press in 1869 and published the Al-Zawra newspaper.
And the best religious reference to describe the Ottoman Caliphate is Sheikh Ali Abd al-Raziq’s book (Islam and Fundamentals of Government), which was published in 1925 after the overthrow of the Ottoman Caliphate by the Turks, in which he explained that the caliphate is not a religious necessity, and there is no text in the Quran or the Sunnah of the Prophet that refers to it, and that Muslims, according to the Quran, are free in the kind of government they want for their country and for themselves. On the contrary, he said more than that, namely that Islam spread and flourished in the absence of the Ottoman Caliphate, which was based on power and oppression, and that the Khilafah is a bad principle, because no ordinary person can succeed the prophet sent from God.
The biggest problem in our Arab world is that of those who accept the Turkish or Iranian role and promote it, and these, if we think rightly, are motivated by their religious feelings, but if they think a little bit and study the history, they will realize that neither Turks nor Iranians are interested in the application of religion or the interest of Muslims, as much as they are interested in dominating Arab countries and restoring their (glories) earlier in the name of Islam and at the expense of Muslims.
The Iranians have created, trained, armed and deployed dozens of militias in the Arab world in order to prepare for their control over the region, and in the name of Islam as well. These militias now face the Iraqi government, launch Katyusha rockets at Iraqi airports, camps, institutions and foreign embassies, kidnap and kill militants and intellectuals, and force officials to sign corrupt contracts, using weapons , wheels, identities, state capabilities and money. Can a sane person believe that these militias, and Iran behind them, are seeking Iraq’s interest? Or does he seek hegemony in the name of religion and restore (glories) Iran at the expense of Iraq?
The Arab countries are called upon to take a common and firm position on these threats, which will one day affect us all if we leave the matter to chance. Today, the Arab countries must strongly support Egypt and Iraq to face the dangers of Turkey and Iran. If Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Libya and Lebanon are weakened in the face of Iranian and Turkish threats, the other Arab countries will also be threatened, as they mainly fit into the pattern of Iranian hegemony. -Turkish. We must alert the world to these dangers to global peace and security, as they will redraw the map of the region and the emergence of new religious empires will threaten not only the Arab region, but the rest of the world.
We tell the dreamers of the return (glories) that you will not be able to reach them because there are those who prevent and dissuade you, and the people of the region will not give in to your threats and ambitions. But you have to admit that saying it alone will not convince them. The unified Arab position is the solution to face the fateful challenges.
[ad_2]
Source link
