[ad_1]
The Swedish music company Spotivay has announced that it has filed a lawsuit against Apple with the European Union for monopolizing, hurt consumers and smothering innovation through the rules imposed on its store's ## 147 ############################################################################### 39; applications.
Dispute Apple and SpotPay bYears ago
Daniel Eck, founder and CEO of SputePay, commented on the dispute between Sputivay and Apple that his company had filed a complaint against Apple with the European Commission, the control body charged with preventing monopolies and maintain fair competition. Innovation deliberately and negatively affected the user experience, besides the fact that Apple represented both the player and the referee, which deliberately hurt developers of other applications , and Daniel Eck confirmed that the complaint to the European Commission was the last solution after many unsuccessful attempts to solve problems. Apple.
Sputivay and Apple Dispute: What do you see Spotify?
According to Daniel Eck, founder and CEO of SputePay, Apple operates the Apps Store, a platform for more than one billion users worldwide, owning the iOS and other competitor of Spotify. Give yourself unfair advantages that affect the competitors.
Daniel Eck complained that Apple had charged 30% of Spotivay's paid registration fees, including a promotion of a free service to a premium or pay service, which he said was detrimental to competition and users. Subscription for it to become superior to the Apple Music Service Apple Music.
Sputivay claimed that Apple applies a series of technical restrictions that affect the experience it offers users if it chooses not to rely on its own payment system. There is an example that restricts Sputivay's connection with the users of the application, so that the company can not send emails to users. The updates prevent SPOTIVAY from competing by blocking access to services and devices such as Siri and Headset. AccueilPod Smart and clock Apple Watch.
Sputivay said that he did not want Apple's special treatment, but was simply asking for the same treatment as many App Store apps, such as Uber and Deliveroo, that indicate not being submitted to the same restrictions. Percent.
Sputivay and Apple Dispute: What are the demands of Spotify?
- Justice in the competition between applications of the App Store, including Apple Music, so that all applications are subject to the same rules and limitations.
- Apple does not force users and application developers to use their own payment systems.
- The App Store does not block communication between developers and users.
In addition to filing a complaint with the European Commission, Sputivay has launched an advertising campaign explaining its position against Apple, which includes a website and a video posted on YouTube.
Sputivay and Apple quarrel: What do you see Apple?
Apple did not delay its response, posting a Spotify attacking statement on its official website, claiming that Sputivay was concealing his financial motives through a misguided speech, which prompted him to react.
- Apple said it was not deliberately delaying Sputivay's updates and denounced the charges related to the application of its smartwatch, indicating that the Spotify application was now taking first place in its category for Apple Watch users.
- According to Apple, Sputivay wants to take advantage of the benefits offered to developers of free applications, even when users subscribe to the paid version, without having to pay fees for applications selling material goods, including services. taxi and catering.
- Apple attacked the Spotify app in its dealings with artists and musicians, claiming that the company wanted to get more revenue from the App Store, but also from artists, when Sputevay took action in Justice against musicians after the US Copyright Council decided to raise the rate they received.
Sputivay's complaint against Appeal reaches the European Commission for monopoly after remarks by Senator Elizabeth Warren, who said last week that she would face big tech companies when she would be elected president in 2020 for the same reasons invoked by Apple to own such stores in order to exploit its competitors. By imposing special rules.
A spokesman for the European Commission told the Wall Street Journal that the Commission had received a complaint from Sputivay that it was now assessing according to the usual procedure. Google fines Google $ 5 billion By the beginning of the year 2018, the company would have violated the moth laws by using the most popular operating system for Android smartphones.
[ad_2]
Source link
