[ad_1]
The class action lawsuit, which was filed last week against the Connecticut-based fast food giant, includes accusations of fraud and false advertising of the contents of the tuna sandwiches.
The lawsuit said the sandwiches contain “a mixture that is not dependent on tuna at all, but rather a mixture that resembles tuna in shape, color and texture.”
Subway denied the charges and told NBC News in a statement that it “serves 100% cooked tuna in its restaurants, which is mixed with mayonnaise and used in fresh sandwiches and wraps.”
“These baseless accusations threaten to harm our franchisees and small business owners who work tirelessly to uphold the high standards that Subway sets for all of its products,” said Maggie Trux, director of global public relations at Subway. Including tuna. “
“The lawsuit constitutes a reckless and indecent attack on the (Subway) trademark and the livelihoods of California franchisees.” .
The two lawsuits, Karen Dahanwa and Nelima Amin, said they were seeking to represent a class of Subway customers who had purchased the tuna sandwiches and found no trace of them as an ingredient.
The lawsuit, which was filed on Jan. 21, said “independent tests have repeatedly confirmed the validity of what was stated there,” but it does not mention where these tests were performed, when or by whom. .
[ad_2]
Source link
