[ad_1]
The employee dismissed under the article is not accepted at all by the companies.
The show "Tam" presented by the Saudi channel and presented by the media Khalid Al-Aqili, the case of arbitrary dismissal of Saudis, working in the private sector and in large companies, welcomed a number of people affected by these practices by employers suddenly and without warning or guilt, A number of them claim that section 80 only protects the employer because the employee laid-off under this article n & # 39; 39 is not at all accepted by companies.
Nabil al-Salami, one of the victims, said his supervisor was not Saudi and that he was violating serious and severe violations of the SAMA system, which can not monitor the company, one of the board members being in charge of SAMA.
He stated that he was severely affected by this arbitrary dismissal, where he was a director of the company and was suddenly separated and was followed by the withdrawal of his car because he could not pay his installments. And threatened to leave home for not paying rent to the landlord, asking SAMA to monitor the company and all the evidence exists.
Abdullah al-Anzi said that he had been fired while he was on sick leave. The company's lawyer called him: "The company does not want you." He promised to hold a management position in the company and was surprised by the dismissal. With him and his family a lot.
"Article 80 only protects the employer, as he can prove and be held responsible by the employee." Maher al-Shammari said: "His father died about a month ago and he wanted his case to be dissolved.
The media put an end to Khaled al-Aqili's program addressing the responsible authorities, saying: Article 80 has dissociated many in the field, why do not you hear about Returned persons ?, Article 80 has forced many heads of families to seek alms, and we hope to re-examine them.
"Tam" discusses the issue of the dismissal of arbitrary Saudis … and the people concerned: Article 80 protects only the employer!
Yasser Al Otaibi
previously
2019-02-25
The show "Tam" presented by the Saudi channel and presented by the media Khalid Al-Aqili, the case of arbitrary dismissal of Saudis, working in the private sector and in large companies, welcomed a number of people affected by these practices by employers suddenly and without warning or guilt, A number of them claim that section 80 only protects the employer because the employee laid-off under this article n & # 39; 39 is not at all accepted by companies.
Nabil al-Salami, one of the victims, said his supervisor was not Saudi and that he was violating serious and severe violations of the SAMA system, which can not monitor the company, one of the board members being in charge of SAMA.
He stated that he was severely affected by this arbitrary dismissal, where he was a director of the company and was suddenly separated and was followed by the withdrawal of his car because he could not pay his installments. And threatened to leave home for not paying rent to the landlord, asking SAMA to monitor the company and all the evidence exists.
Abdullah al-Anzi said that he had been fired while he was on sick leave. The company's lawyer called him: "The company does not want you." He promised to hold a management position in the company and was surprised by the dismissal. With him and his family a lot.
"Article 80 only protects the employer, as he can prove and be held responsible by the employee." Maher al-Shammari said: "His father died about a month ago and he wanted his case to be dissolved.
The media put an end to Khaled al-Aqili's program addressing the responsible authorities, saying: Article 80 has dissociated many in the field, why do not you hear about Returned persons ?, Article 80 has forced many heads of families to seek alms, and we hope to re-examine them.
February 25, 2019 – Jumada Al-Akhirah 1440
10:00 p.m.
The employee dismissed under the article is not accepted at all by the companies.
The show "Tam" presented by the Saudi channel and presented by the media Khalid Al-Aqili, the case of arbitrary dismissal of Saudis, working in the private sector and in large companies, welcomed a number of people affected by these practices by employers suddenly and without warning or guilt A number of them claim that section 80 protects only the employer because the employee laid-off under this article does not protect the employer. is not accepted at all by the companies.
Nabil al-Salami, one of the victims, said his supervisor was not Saudi and that he was violating serious and severe violations of the SAMA system, which can not monitor the company, one of the board members being in charge of SAMA.
He stated that he was severely affected by this arbitrary dismissal, where he was a director of the company and was suddenly separated and was followed by the withdrawal of his car because he could not pay his installments. And threatened to leave home for not paying rent to the landlord, asking SAMA to monitor the company and all the evidence exists.
Abdullah al-Anzi said that he had been fired while he was on sick leave. The company's lawyer called him: "The company does not want you." He promised to hold a management position in the company and was surprised by the dismissal. With him and his family a lot.
"Article 80 only protects the employer, as he can prove and be held responsible by the employee." Maher al-Shammari said: "His father died about a month ago and he wanted his case to be dissolved.
The media put an end to Khaled al-Aqili's program addressing the responsible authorities, saying: Article 80 has dissociated many in the field, why do not you hear about Returned persons ?, Article 80 has forced many heads of families to seek alms, and we hope to re-examine them.
[ad_2]
Source link
