[ad_1]
Decision under section 3 of the Crime Act
The Riyadh Criminal Court sentenced a citizen to one year in prison and a fine of five thousand riyals, after being convicted of writing offensive slogans against the judiciary and questioning fairness and the impartiality of the judges of the kingdom.
The conviction of the convicted person included his conviction under section 3 of the Information Crime Act, after the Court had recognized all his rights and given him sufficient time to present his case. arguments in this case.
In declaring the judgment, the Court understood that the defendant had the right to oppose the judgment during the statutory period, to appeal and to bring the case before the Court of Appeal, which upheld the judgment and acquitted the imperative character.
The general prison for the man who abused the justice and questioned the integrity of the judges
Abdullah Al Barqawi
previously
2019-03-19
The Riyadh Criminal Court sentenced a citizen to one year in prison and a fine of five thousand riyals, after being convicted of writing offensive slogans against the judiciary and questioning fairness and the impartiality of the judges of the kingdom.
The conviction of the convicted person included his conviction under section 3 of the Information Crime Act, after the Court had recognized all his rights and given him sufficient time to present his case. arguments in this case.
In declaring the judgment, the Court understood that the defendant had the right to oppose the judgment during the statutory period, to appeal and to bring the case before the Court of Appeal, which upheld the judgment and acquitted the imperative character.
March 19, 2019 – 12 Rajab 1440
The time now is 09:31 AM
Decision under section 3 of the Crime Act
The Riyadh Criminal Court sentenced a citizen to one year in prison and a fine of five thousand riyals, after being convicted of writing offensive slogans against the judiciary and questioning fairness and the impartiality of the judges of the kingdom.
The conviction of the convicted person included his conviction under section 3 of the Information Crime Act, after the Court had recognized all his rights and given him sufficient time to present his case. arguments in this case.
In declaring the judgment, the Court understood that the defendant had the right to oppose the judgment during the statutory period, to appeal and to bring the case before the Court of Appeal, which upheld the judgment and acquitted the imperative character.
[ad_2]
Source link
