The League of Arab States is in shock… Will new entities emerge from its midst?

The idea of ​​creating the Arab League began; According to some accounts, after a speech by British Foreign Minister Anthony Eden in 1941 on the need for this advice, at the end of the Franco-British colonial era.
There were reasons for this call focused on preserving the interests of Britain and France, and a year after that conversation Mustafa Al-Nahhas invited the then Prime Minister of Egypt to discuss the idea of ​​creating an entity that would bring together the Arabs, and after a series of meetings and consultations, Egypt, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Yemen agreed to create the League States. Arabia in 1945, which then expanded to 22 Arab countries, the last of which was the Comoros, which joined the League in 1993.

And after the recent position of the Arab League, which implicitly supports the recent normalization agreements between certain Arab countries and the Zionist entity; And the violation of the Arab Peace Initiative based on the principle of land for peace; Some Member States have expressed their rejection of the League’s position in an important way by apologizing for the rotating presidency of the League, starting with: Palestine in mourning, then Qatar, Comoros, Kuwait and Lebanon, and last but not least Libya, and the gap in the Arab position has become the rule and consensus is absent.

In 2002, the Arab summit held in Beirut adopted the peace initiative launched by the late Saudi King Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz (he was then crown prince), which stipulated the withdrawal of the Zionist entity from occupied Arab lands on the borders of the June 4, 1967 and the return of the refugees, as well as the withdrawal. From the Golan Heights in exchange for full Arab normalization with the Zionist entity, recognition of its existence and exchange of relations with it. The Arab countries accepted this proposal and it became a project under the name of “Arab Peace Initiative”.

Despite the advanced and unprecedented steps of the initiative in the Arab world, the Zionist entity did not take a step forward, officially rejected the initiative, and the initiative remained in the drawers.
However, since then, the official Arab position has remained the same in adopting this initiative, until the normalization agreements come recently, which fell outside the framework of the Arab consensus, and as a result the Palestinian Minister of Foreign Affairs stepped down. is excused for continuing to preside over the League League and five countries in the same decision.

The positions of certain Arab countries with regard to the “Arab Spring countries” have caused a deep rupture in Arab positions due to the conflict of interests. The Palestinian question, which is the central question, has become a point of contention after having been a totally consensual issue.

The main idea on which the League of Arab States was based, and which formed its internal charter, is to seek to strengthen the links between the Arab countries, to maintain their independence and to preserve the security and safety of the Arab region in various fields.

This came to a complete end with the succession of internal Arab crises since the start of the “Arab Spring” at the end of 2010, and Arab countries have become an arena for Arab-Arab and Arab-regional conflicts.

The positions of some Arab countries with regard to< pays du printemps arabe >> caused a deep rupture in Arab positions due to the conflict of interest. The Palestinian question, which is the central question, has become a point of contention after having been a totally consensual issue.
What made matters worse was the presence of external interference in the sovereign positions of some Arab countries, and the normalization agreements came like the straw that broke the back of the camel, and that is perhaps to be the real entry towards the end of the existence of the Arab League in a short period of time.

The Arab League’s stance on the normalization accords followed a series of deep differences, particularly on the issues of Syria, Yemen and Libya. Even the regional relations that bind the Arab countries with their neighbors Turkey and Iran, and this series of deep disagreements have led to the weakness, if not the absence of any influential role for the League at the regional and international levels.
The consensus model required in the decisions made by the university is taken into account This is the most important obstacle to the approval of any political position in the face of a crisis, because the decision requires the approval of all, and not with the democratic system which approves the decision by the majority system. It has become very difficult in the world of politics for several factors, including the entry of some countries into incompatible regional conflicts between Arab countries and the system. Polarizations between states.

And that follows the course of events at the Arab, regional and international levels, with the difficulty of amending the internal system of the university and the decision-making mechanism to deal with political issues in a democratic system.

The declaration of the three no’s at the Khartoum summit in 1967, which is “neither reconciliation, nor negotiation, nor recognition of Israel”.

Because it will inevitably lead to a real end of the League and the existence of a new entity ruled by Zionism, which Abdullah Al-Ashaal, the Egyptian politician, recently spoke about, as the impact of the penetration and the influence of the Zionist entity has become evident, especially with the presence of American international support specifically for the Zionist entity and the stages of normalization, and this will become clear after the elections. America next.

And between the declaration of the three no’s at the Khartoum summit in 1967, which is “no reconciliation, negotiation and recognition of Israel”, and what happened recently in Cairo 2020 concerning the passage of the normalization agreements, it seems that mutual interests between certain countries, whether Arab-Arab or Arab-regional, will be the basis of the formation of organs. Or new advice, and there may not be joint Arab action outside the framework of certain economic, cultural and social issues, as well as security coordination.