The next Arab summit: another summit or another summit? – Nassif up to

The question should be asked about the upcoming Arab summit to be held in Tunisia at the end of the month. Will be a routine summit, a new number added to the number of summits that, according to the Arab League system, are to be held each year during the month of March.
A summit in which each state presents its position generally known under such or such question and ends with a general statement prepared in advance, "as long as it is a repetition of previous positions in general, sometimes with additions or revisions ". A statement reaffirming principled positions on key issues in the region, challenging and appealing, condemning and condemning. May contain a reservation of one or more States to the resolution or any of its provisions, in particular the position of Iran and its allies in the region in the context of the escalation of the Cold War to Middle East.
It is possible and possible that there is an exception, if not for the first time in the history of the Arab League, even a few times, to seriously consider the development of concrete proposals and policies in the face of certain challenges and risks. A policy that benefits from a broad practical consensus, not only by word of mouth, but by the desire to provide the necessary support for this consensus at a later date so that the resolution adopted at the summit does not end at the end of the summit.
***
The following are some of the challenges that must be given priority because of their serious repercussions, which affect all Arabs, if not at the same time, at different times:
Firstly, to recall the bad situation in the Arab world, we refer to a statement by the World Bank on the general cost of wars and armed conflicts that Arab countries witnessed between 2010 and 2018 and amounting to about 900 billions of dollars. This includes the cost of destruction and opportunities for lost growth. This figure was considered a minimum. The report also pointed to "a significant drop in the justice index of the income distribution, which sits at the tail end of the world's countries lagging behind those of Latin America and the United States. Africa".
It was expected, among other things, at the Arab Summit for Economic Development in Beirut last January, but the nature of Arab policies has dropped the level of the summit in terms of representation and decision-making, which has lost credibility in terms of nature and quality of deliberations and decisions and follow-up.
Second: The entry of the "Arab Spring" in ninth grade, although the best expression of the "four chapters" on customary expression: states exploded and became fallen countries living in civil wars such as Syria, Libya and Yemen and international and regional conflicts on its territory and countries that have not sunk into civil war and "wars" of others "on their lands, but they share with all other countries and the countries that have not known the "Arab Spring" the deterioration of their economic and social conditions and which increase this deterioration and the risks that it entails for the security and the stability if it is not not treated effectively: they are time bombs ready to explode or detonate at a distance.
Third: a number of observers find that we are living on the eve of a "second Arab Spring" that began its departure from Algeria and Sudan with repercussions on other countries. over time.
Fourth, the absence of an active Arab role in resolving burning issues, particularly in Syria and Libya, is flagrant and outrageous, as if they were just observers who were not interested in addressing what was happening between the walls of their house.
We witnessed the beginning of a unilateral Arab normalization with Syria in the direction of Syria's return to the League of Arab States, at a rate that has slowed down and whose signs back to the 39, Syrian university have stopped, on the basis of Western advice. The train has not started yet.
Fifth: The summit is on the eve of the Israeli elections, which will restore the fundamental right to power, regardless of the composition of the new Knesset, and the eve of America's "Deal of the Century".
Elements of this agreement, which also appeared through the new "American language" on Jerusalem, the occupied territories and refugees. All show that the US peace project can not respect the minimum acceptable Palestinian and Arab, because it lays the foundations, rules and principles of the peace process and its mandate. How does the Arab answer to that?
Will the Arabs be satisfied with Tarshan's dialogue, based on the reestablishment of the Arab peace initiative without giving any impetus on the ground, so as not to clash with the US position for regional strategic reasons?
The next summit is at a crossroads: will it simply act as a figure added to the number of previous Arab summits, or a pause moment to work towards crystallization of the minimum possible agreement to deal with these challenges so as not to continue the collapse that will eventually be paid by the Arab peoples?