[ad_1]
For the second time in a row, the Football Association Disciplinary Committee rejected the club's protests against Club One against the regularity of player Abdullah Al-Awesheer.
Al-Hazm protested against their participation in the March 9 match and ended in a positive draw, while Al-Hilal protested against his participation in the March 23 match and ended up in a draw. draw.
The committee dismissed the summons, as Article 132 of the regulation did not provide that "the protest is an objection based on facts that have a direct bearing on the match of one of the two teams as regards non-compliance with the Union Regulation or this Regulation ".
The statistics in the Crescent game and one, is that the Crescent has gained the ball of 74%, and 20 shots, including 6 shots on goal, while the ball pass accuracy of 85%, and has paid 7 corner shots.
These statistics confirm the influence of Abdullah Al-Awaysheer in the match, as he faced a number of attacks that could have become targets and ended with the victory of the Red Croissant.
The Discipline Committee stated that the Code of Discipline and Ethics, in accordance with section 125, stated that judicial committees could issue the resolution without giving reasons and that the party wishing to obtain the reasons for the resolution the decision had to submit a written request within five days from the date of notification of the decision.
Article 125 did not set a deadline for the communication of the reasons for the decision, leaving the discretion to the Commission, on the understanding that the appeal period runs from the date of receipt of the reasons for the decision.
The Committee explained that the mechanism it had adopted was the same as in the FIFA Rules of Discipline in Article 116, as well as in the Code of Discipline and Professional Conduct of CAF in Article 111.
Read also:
[ad_2]
Source link
