[ad_1]
The story of the famous hashtag “# Vin_jacket” cast its shadow in the corridors of justice between an international actor and a sports media, and ended with the issuance of a judgment in public and private law between the two parties who won in decision.
While the prosecution demanded that a well-known international actor be sentenced to a term of imprisonment not exceeding one year and a fine not exceeding 500 thousand riyals, either one of those two penalties, and the accused of committing an information crime by defaming others, inflicting harm on them through various computer means and closing his account on social media watched by millions of people; The criminal court ruled that what was issued by the player after posting videos on social media platforms that are the subject of the trial against a media outlet, was a reaction to a previous media interview, which prompted the creation of a “Trend Hashtag” titled “# Where_Jacket”, and the court publicly reviewed the clips posted by the player from Just Before, due to the offensive media criticism he received. decided not to convict the player for allegedly violating the information system crime. And he decided to reject the lawsuit brought by the sports journalist in private law, in which he demanded the punishment of the player who is very popular in the sports community. According to Okaz’s sources, the public prosecutor’s office filed an indictment against the international actor in accordance with the law of criminal procedure, and the player was informed of his rights under the law.
Defamation and exchange of charges
The Acting Prosecutor’s indictment read: “The player allegedly discredited the media on social networks, as he admitted to the record of his statements that the circulating clip was the one that had done it, in addition of the minutes. to see the discussions. The attorney general clarified that what the accused player did while fully legally qualified is a prohibited act, punishable by law and criminalized by law, and is required to prove what is attributed to him and to condemn him to imprisonment and a fine. , in accordance with paragraph 5 of Article 3 of the Law on Combating Information Crimes, and to close its accounts on the social communication site, indicating that the special law still exists. Next, the media official claiming private rights presented a list of lawsuits in which he accused the player of defaming him, compromising his privacy and abusing the cell phone, photographing clips and by posting them on social networks (“YouTube”, “Twitter” and “WhatsApp”). Among the abuses contained by the recording, for example Not limited to, and it spread widely and as a result of this the hashtag was created, “# Where’s the jacket” and contained offensive phrases including “You do not respect your old age”, “You must know that your fate is wrong”, “The brown jacket that I was wearing and I took it and you came back and you settled in like crazy and got it. taken because it’s a brand. ”“ I consider you and nothing ”, which caused him some harm and insults, as the clips spread widely on social media platforms (“ YouTube ”,“ Twitter ” and “WhatsApp”), and hashtags spread widely. The media official presented in court 17 videos attributed to the player and posted on social media, which he considered to be insults, ridicule and fabrications, which caused much of their popularity across the realm in a negative way, pointing out that the accused player admitted he posted the clip to his account, and the reporter concluded by demanding punishment for The player has the right to dissuade and reprimand him.
The player responds: his accusations are false
The accused player responded to the court with a memorandum, in response to private law, in which he said the journalist who brought the case had previously committed fraud against him and accused him of false accusations in the media. Football, and he claimed that he caused the demolition of the entity, which caused the mobilization of the masses and public opinion on him as an international player and captain of the team, which made him encouraged to answer him so as not to repeat his mistakes. The court reviewed the videos released by the accused player and the videos released by the complainant media and found them as described in the case. The player submitted another memorandum, in response to the prosecution’s list, in which he explained that the prosecution had erred in describing the case to the court. He explained that the complainant, who is a journalist, charged him with malicious accusations and accusations, and verbal slurs against him on various social media sites, claiming it was a press review, according to what he said, and he attached TV clips. as proof of this, considering what he had done contrary to societal and Sharia norms, and the player concluded his note by asking him to return the case.
Court: Speak badly
After several sessions, the court clarified that it was proven that the player had broadcast the video clip in question and that it was a reaction to the interview of the media person claiming the private right in the media. The court ruled that what the player had done was akin to “speaking badly”, due to what he had suffered by the plaintiff, so the court decided not to convict the player for the alleged violation of the system. fight against information crimes. against public law, and he also decided to dismiss the media case In private law, the appeals court last week upheld the ruling, and it became final.
[ad_2]
Source link
