[ad_1]
Published image, Youtube
It seems that Saudi cyberspace in particular The Arab in general is forced to move from one argument to another without Comfort, on issues mainly related to religion and politics.
The controversy this time focused on Saudi writer Turki Al-Hamad, after posting a tweet in which he considered Sahih al-Bukhari to be at odds with the Quran.
Speaking of the crisis raised by the drawings of the Prophet Muhammad in France, Al-Hamad called for criticism of “the legacy which provided the living material for these drawings, mainly Sahih al-Bukhari”, as he put it. .
The blog has come under harsh criticism, amounting to accusing it of contempt for religions and demanding that it be held accountable.
The Saudi writer did not respond to his comments during this writing.
The division was evident on Al-Hamad’s statements in the hashtag # Turki_ Al-Hamad_is_al-Bukhari, “which scored over 90 A thousand tweets in 24 hours.
The hashtag took a high position in the list of most popular topics in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, followed by another tag with the name of the Saudi writer.
‘A call for reform or targeted statements ‘؟
Asking Al-Hamd about Sahih Al-Bukhari and his calls to revise heritage is not a new question, but it certainly has many implications and dimensions.
The writer’s statement comes in a context that many describe as “sensitive and dangerous”.
Some tweeters have linked Al-Hamad’s opinion on Sahih Al-Bukhari to what they called “the French president’s war on Islam.”
Conspiracy theory has prevailed over some of the comments homeowners see criticizing Sahih al-Bukhari, “a plan to shake the confidence of the new generation in the foundations of religion and the establishment of an alternative culture.” , according to them.
On the other hand, another section of commentators defended al-Hamad.
Some of them cited hadiths from Imams and Sheikhs who questioned some of the elements mentioned in Sahih al-Bukhari and other hadiths.
From this point of view, the tweeters find that “the writer did not despise the Islamic religion, but” only criticized a set of works and ideas of infallible human beings “.
Others were taken aback by the laudable attack, rejecting “the worship of Bukhari, and some adhered to the culture of transmission and its submission to the spirit.”
But opponents of Al-Hamad consider that the attack on him deserves it, and they stress that “the problem is not in his person, but in the phenomenon of insulting the sacredness of Islam, which is recently turned into mode, “as they put it.
Some of them warn against “promoting the speech of Al-Hamad and Wasim Yusef in exchange for the exclusion of true scholars”.
While others praise the discussions opened by the declarations of Al-Hamad and the Egyptian researcher Islam Al-Buhairi, and consider them “the beginning of a cultural and intellectual revolution”.
Defenders of the Saudi writer agree with him in approach and thinking, and see him as one of the “symbols of change and progress”.
Against this background, one commented: “The supporters of change in Saudi Arabia have achieved unprecedented achievements that were able to stop the wave of revival with official support and royal decisions.
As for the former Imam of Haram, Adel Al-Kalbani, he asked: “Is this a call for a new religion?”
In turn, former Kuwaiti MP Walid Al-Tabtabae felt that questioning the authenticity of the prophet’s hadiths called into question the veracity of the Quran itself.
Tweeter Saad disagrees with Al-Tabtabai and says “Al-Hamad” is very logical and rational. What does it mean to be – the essential – of the hadiths of Abu Hurairah’s narration, who only accompanied the Messenger two years ago?
On the other hand, skeptics hold onto the scientific tools that some follow to deal with heritage. They agree with Al-Hamad and Al-Buhairi in principle, but they methodically disagree with them.
While they believe in the need to desecrate religion and heritage texts, they describe the articles and call for heritage and religion review on some websites as “selective and unscientific.”
And they say these “recent appeals, despite their importance, are driven by personal impressions and political motives that match the desires of those in power and are lacking in arguments and objectivity,” as they put it.
This section of commentators rejects claims that al-Hamad should be held accountable or the ban on those with similar opinions because thought is confronted with thought and not held back.
Turki Al-Hamad is a Saudi writer and politician with several books.
Al-Hamad had already been arrested for 5 months at the end of 2012 because of tweets deemed offensive to the Prophet and which caused widespread controversy at the time.
In recent years, the debate on the authenticity of the hadiths contained in Sahih al-Bukhari has imposed itself on the comments of Arab users of social networks.
Many have been attacked for their critiques of hadiths and heritage texts, including Egyptian scholar Islam Beheiry, Tunisian scholar Hala Al-Wardi, and other academics and preachers.
Source link
