[ad_1]
Saleh al-Fawzan, a member of the Upper Council of Ulemas, explained the details of the hadith on the invalidity of the validity of the testimony of the Bedouin living in the desert, on the urban life in the village, by revealing the reason .
He pointed out that "Al-Fawzan", commenting on the words of Abu Huraira, "may not be a Bedouin testimony for the village owner", explaining that it is because the Bedouins and Arabs show them the alienation and do not exempt the value of the certificate because of their ignorance.
At a conference on Shari'a Certificate in Justice and His Checks, he stated in a video that Bedouins should not know the limits of what God revealed to his messenger, while Urban is educated and that he attends the advice of scientists and dhikr, so he is closer to honesty than Arabi.
In a related context, Dr. Nasser Baqmi, a member of the Shura Council's Committee on Islamic and Judiciary Affairs, said that Abu Hanifa, Shafi'i and Ahmed made themselves famous for accepting Badawi's testimony. on the urban because that is its origin.
He explained that Al-Ma'ayuf had spoken of the acceptance of the testimony of the Prophet's Arabs, stating, "The Prophet peace be upon him before the testimony of al-A & rt; seeing the crescent, and this point of view was favored by Sheikh Al Bassam, may God have mercy on him, while the hadeeth mentioned in the passage wears the veil on those who do not know his
[ad_2]
Source link
