[ad_1]
In the corridors of the courts of the Kingdom, there are various cases in which convicts are sentenced, as well as victims who are victims of fraud and fraud, including those who surrender and some people facing.
In this context, several teachers have been victims of similar frauds. .
The fraud starts with a newspaper advertisement about his "fake" business, which pays the debts in exchange for a percentage of the business, then talks to the teacher to give him a civil status card and a letter identifying the salary. He then gets the signature of several papers, including white papers. Blackmail and threaten these papers later.
One of the "accused in the case" teachers, who was trying to erect, asked the accused for these papers in addition to the family card and the ATM card. She was surprised that she had taken out a loan without his knowledge. When I went to the bank, she learned that the company that had contracted the loan had gone to the center. Azizia's police asked them after the information about the company, and shortly thereafter, I read in the newspapers the news of this person's arrest, and then I filed a complaint against him in Jeddah.
But the professor fell into the trap of this man, when he called her and threatened her with the white papers that she had previously signed, as well as selling the heirs' house in which lived his family and offered him to take out a loan on his behalf and more than once and handed over to a third "accused", even The bank made a reservation on his salary.
Later, she asked him for her personal photo, to meet the third person in Jeddah, and took several false papers from one of her teachers with her personal photo, so that she could take out a loan in their name, and the defendant was subjected to this for fear of threats and scandal.
The accused repeated this act more than once and separated from time to time for a few months until her arrest once.
The prosecution 's investigation revealed that the accused was conducting these operations from prison and was getting the signature of his victims through the company he had announced, while that the accused acknowledged the details of the crimes that she had committed with the accused.
She confessed that she was taking an envelope containing the counterfeit papers of the third person and that the first accused had sent her the signature method of the victim that he knew in advance, thanks to the papers that had them signed. She had entered the bank to take the loan and sign the papers, then go out and give all the money to that person.
The first accused, the "brains of fraud", and the third, the extradited and the convicted, were in conflict, but the court was able to uncover the mystery by comparing the statements of the accused and the victims .
Ask to marry the victim to get his signature..
The first defendant obtained the signature of one of his victims in an exceptional manner, the statements of the teacher "the victim" stating inter alia that she did not know the accused. He asked to marry her and that was not done.
The victim explained that she had already entered her phone number in one of the letters and that someone had called after a while to tell her that She wanted to marry her and that she had her number in one of the letters. She also asked her bank statements to transfer money to her account in order to prove her good intentions. Finally, she asked him to sign it to be able to sign it at the villa office that he will build for his wedding.
She confirmed that in good faith, he had certified her and provided her with her national identity, bank statements and signature in Arabic and English by sending her to the WhatsApp program.
When he got what he wanted, he created problems with it and eventually communicated with her and changed her cell phone number directly, noting that, among her requests, were the address of her home and the name and address of the school for which she worked.
The complainants also admitted that they had to repay the loans that had been withdrawn in their name and discovered this after sending them letters from the banks informing them of the trap they had committed and signed a complaint in Jeddah against the defendant .
The Chamber found that the first and second accused were charged with fraudulent identity and pay letters of identification and that, on the basis of the accused's confession, she was fully competent, even threatened, which did not exonerate her. not of his legal responsibility.
It was also proved that the first accused confessed his relationship with the accused and that the accused did not know the teachers who complained, which confirms that the fraud had been committed by the accused. first accused, in addition to matching the statements of the accused with those of the teachers.
As for the third accused, he proved that he did not know what he was giving to the accused for false papers and that he was not a partner of the first accused of his institution, as was the lack of will on his part to commit an intentional criminal act.
The court sentenced the first defendant and the second defendant for falsification, sentenced to two years imprisonment, including the extent of the arrest while awaiting trial. case, as well as a fine of 5,000 riyals each, and decided not to sentence the third defendant who was delivering the papers and was receiving money.
According to the Code of Judgments, Principles and Sanctions of the House of Grievances, the Court of Appeal upheld the verdict pronounced by the judiciary.
[ad_2]
Source link
