[ad_1]
NASA's Apollo 17 mission that brought 12 people to the moon in 1972 so far to be their greatest success. Astronomers collect stones, photograph everything they can, perform a number of experiments, pose flags and return home.
Despite this great mission of several weeks, the Apollo program did not allow people to stay on the Moon in the long run. Even today, 45 years after this last mission, there are many reasons why people should return to Earth's satellite.
Researchers and entrepreneurs believe that the Moon's base could become a service station for long space travel. build telescope telescopes, facilitate the possibility of life on Mars and solve the eternal scientific mysteries surrounding the emergence of the Earth and the Moon. There is also a tourist potential
– A permanent research station on the Moon is the next logical step. It's only at a distance of three days. We have to invent a few things and test them before going into space – says former astronaut Chris Hadfield
however, a series of astronauts and astronauts. Experts will say that the obstacles that had no missions on the moon were trivial and trivial. 19659008] Budget
A particularly important barrier is expenditure. Under the law signed by US President Donald Tramp in March 2017, NASA's annual budget is $ 19.5 billion and, next year, it could reach $ 19.9 billion. Although this is a significant amount, compared to allowances eg. the US military, which accounts for about $ 600 billion a year, seems insignificant. One particularly important project is the modernization and expansion of the nuclear arsenal.
– NASA's share of the federal budget peaked at 4% in 1965. Over the last 40 years, it has remained below 1%, and reached 0.4% of the federal budget over the past year. Last 15 years – Walter Kaningem, astronaut of the Apollo 7 mission.
In 2005, NASA estimated about 133 billion.
– Research missions involving people are the most difficult to obtain political support. If Congress does not decide to invest more money in the program, we can only talk about missions – he stressed.
Politics
The purpose of the Tramp Administration is to bring astronauts to the moon around 2023, which was the end of Tramp's second presidential term, of course he? s there. And there is a new problem – political battles.
– Why should anyone trust any president and his announcements of something that could happen in two terms in the future. From the point of view of the astronauts, the most important mission, the design, the tests and many other things could take more than two presidential terms.
– I would like the next president to support a budget that will allow us to: "US missions have had different views on space missions, and NASA has spent $ 9 billion in five years to design, build and test equipment for space missions, "says astronaut Scott Kelly. space program
– The American leadership inspires everything to do something that no other nation can do. We showed it in a short time 45 years ago. I do not think we've repeated it since. I believe that everything depends on the political commitment – said the astronaut Baz Oldrin
The Milk of Desire
They can encourage the desire of the people, which is still a little tepid on that question. Even at the apogee of the Apollo program, when Nil Armstrong and Baz Oldrin appeared, only 53% of Americans felt that the program was worth the cost.
Today, 55% of Americans think that the return to the moon should be NASA's priority. 44% believe that astronauts should not return to the moon.
Deadly Trap for Humans
The month is also an old deadly 4.5 billion trap for humans that can not be hello for almost.
The surface is covered with craters and walls that threaten a safe landing. Before the first landing in 1969, the US government was spending billions of dollars developing, launching and delivering satellites capable of taking off the surface that would help to select potential landing sites.
The dust of the meteorite is much more worrying. Southern California engineer Mad Tangagel wrote in 2014 that the moon is covered with a thin layer of lunar dust such as an electrostatically charged powder through interaction with the solar wind. It is very abrasive and fills very quickly with space suits, vehicles and systems.
Astronaut Peggy Vitson, who spent 665 days in the universe, caused dust problems as the main problems of the Apollo missions. "If we spend a lot of time there and build permanent settlements, we have to find out how we are going to solve this problem," she said.
The problem is also sunlight. About 14 days in a row on the surface is hot as hell because it is exposed to direct sunlight, and then the surface of the moon becomes one of the coolest places in the world. ;universe.
NASA is developing a small nuclear reactor that astronauts need energy during the dark days.
– No doubt, if we want to go further, especially if we want to go beyond the moon, we need a new transport. Today, we are still in the era of "cars" – said astronaut Jeffrey Hoffman
However, astronauts do not doubt that we will return to the moon and go to Mars . It's just a question of when and how this generation will live.
<! –
Notification triggering paragraph test
->
[ad_2]
Source link
