Discovered why no one for 45 years has landed on the moon, and the first to come will do it!

There is also a tourist potential that we have heard and read in recent years, especially with the development of several technological companies

The Belgrade building is not for sale, but it's worth it !

"The permanent research station of the month is the next logical step, we have to invent a few things and test them before we go to the depths of space," said the researcher. former astronaut Kirs Hadfield

DISCOVERY Here is the parent responsible for being fat because you are big?

Still astronaut and expert and they will agree and say that the obstacles for which There were no missions per month are trivial and mundane A particularly important obstacle for all missions involving people is the expense.

Under the law signed by US President Donald Tramp in March 2017 NASA 's annual budget is $ 19.5 billion, and next year it could reach $ 19.9 billion, although this is a significant amount of money compared to the allocations per year. eg the US Army, which It's raising about $ 600 billion a year, seems insignificant.

In particular, a major project for the modernization and expansion of the nuclear arsenal, which could cost about $ 1.7 trillion over the next 30 years. Compared to some previous days, NASA's budget is relatively small.

WHAT DOES IT DEPOSE TO JAKOV? Mother of the unfortunate: He was a great diver and drowned in a shallow pool, they did not show me the band!

"NASA's share of the federal budget was 4% in 1965. Over the last 40 years Over the last 15 years, it has slowly approached 0.4% of the federal budget," said Volter Cyntham, Apollo 7 mission astronaut.

The Tramp Budget Budget is for one month return missions and one mission on Mars so that there could be problems and problems. In 2005, NASA estimated that the return to the month would cost about $ 133 billion

EASY TRANSFER, NOT OBLIGATORY, NOT CONTACTED The US virus threatens Serbia, even three outbreaks in Belgrade, if you have these symptoms URGENT WHO LEKAR 19659009] "Research missions involving people are the most difficult to get political support." If Congress decides not to invest more money in the missions program, we can only talk said Cyntham. The purpose of the Tramp Administration is to bring the astronauts to the moon around 2023, the year that could end with Tramp's second presidential term, of course he's there. ; obtained.

And that's where the new problem is – political moves

Anyone should trust any president and his announcements of anything that might to occur in two years ahead, it's just a story, "said Hufffield.From the astronauts' point of view, the most important mission, design, tests and more could take more than two presidential terms.

"I would like the next president to support a budget that will allow us to accomplish the missions that are asked of us. US missions have been different in space missions, and NASA has spent $ 9 billion over five years to design, build and test equipment for the space constellation program to bring astronauts to the moon.

After Obama took over the presidency and after he could not accurately assess the cost of the program, Obama instead approved the Space Launch System, a rocket launcher program

Tramp n & rsquo; Did not destroy SLS, but changed the Obama goal of sending astronauts. on the Moon and Mars. These frequent changes and shifts in priorities led to the cancellation, a loss of about $ 20 billion, and in addition, time and years were lost. "19659009]" The American leadership inspired everyone to do something that no other nation can do. 45 years ago, I do not think we said that since then, I believe that everything depends on political commitment, "said astronaut Baz Oldrin. which is still a little lukewarm on this question. Even at the apogee of the Apollo program, after Nil Armstrong and Baz Oldrin were out, only 53% of Americans thought the program was worth it.

Most of the time, this percentage was less than 50. Today, 55% of Americans think The return to the moon should be the priority of NASA, while 44% think that astronauts on the moon should not come back. As for the support of the research on Mars, it is much higher, so 63%. But the financial cost is not the only reason why the return is still an impossible mission.

The month is also an old deadly trap of 4.5 billion people, which should not be taken lightly or underestimated. Before the first landing in 1969, the US government spent billions of dollars in developing, launching and delivering satellites that could capture the surface to help select potential landing sites. However, much more worry is that the impact of the meteorite created – the regolith, the dust.

Aeronautical engineer Mad Thangavel of the University of Southern California wrote in 2014 that the moon was covered with a thin layer of lunar dust. thanks to the interaction with the solar wind, it is very abrasive and enthusiastic, which "spinning" quickly space suits and vehicles.

Astronaut Peggy Witson, who spent 665 days in the universe, "If we spend a lot of time there and build permanent homes, I have to find a way to solve this problem, "she said.

The new problem is sunlight. About 14 days in a piece on the surface is hot as in hell because it's exposed directly to sunlight, because the moon does not have an atmospheric protective layer. 14 days later, there is complete darkness, and the surface of the moon becomes one of the coolest places in the universe. NASA is developing a small Kilopower nuclear reactor that astronauts should provide with the necessary energy during dark days. "

There is no cruel environment for the Moon, but despite this, since it is so close to the Earth, it is better to learn to live," writes he to Tangavel

. stupid billionaires who got into the race. And if it was not for them, that they were only NASA, Boeing, and Lockheed who developed the machinery, there might not be any major changes [[] 19659009] "There is no doubt that we want to go farther than the moon.Today, we are still in the era of" cars, "said astronaut Jeffrey Hoffman

especially on the work of Ilon Mask and his company SpaceX, as well as Jeff Bezos and Blue Origin.The desire and long-term desire of the astronaut to return to the moon easily insert in the long-term desire of Bezos

He presented his idea of ​​building a lunar base in Washington with the Blue Origin New Glenn rocket system.In April he declared that he would "move all the 39; heavy industry of the Earth, which will become a resident area of ​​light industry. "

The SpaceX mask could be at the height of the Lun e before NASA or Blue Origin.Their Falcon Heavy rocket is capable of launching a small space capsule Crew Dragone up to the Moon and back

The Mask said that two individuals had already placed the ways that they can continue this journey. "My dream is that the Moon becomes part of the earth's economic zone, the daily economy, and that's something that should be done," Hoffman said. The astronauts do not doubt our return to the Moon and Mars. It's just a question when and how this generation will experiment.

READ THE NEWS THAT WE ARE EXPRESSED FOR YOU – HERE