[ad_1]
It's a dead gift.
Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., Believed that punishing her city to deal with an increasing number of undocumented migrants while awaiting court hearings would be a punishment.
According to a Washington Post report on Friday, citing "anonymous" officials from the Department of Homeland Security, the White House had questioned the immigration and customs department about unloading illegal immigrants stopped at the border in places known as "sanctuary cities".
The Pelosi office said that this suggestion brought to light the "cynicism and cruelty" of the administration that "uses human beings as pawns in their twisted game to perpetuate fear and demonize immigrants …"
From the point of view of their legislators, the interest of sanctuary cities is that illegal immigrants need a safe place to escape deportation. After all, immigrants and asylum seekers are only there to lead a better life for themselves and their families (and all the better if the Democrats can subsidize them).
Why, then, would a city like San Francisco, located in Pelosi District, not jump at the opportunity to bring in more well-meaning friends?
In addition to providing more beds, free health care and free services for children, thanks to the American taxpayer, congressional Democrats have shown no interest in doing anything for the hundreds of thousands of migrants who are heading to the United States of Central America.
Would these well-meaning foreigners not be better served in cities like New York, Boston and Seattle, where local authorities refuse to comply with federal agents to deport illegal aliens?
The history of the post office never really shows that the intention of the White House was to "fight back against President Trump's political opponents," as the article says. He cites anonymous sources claiming that it was the goal, but even though the authors of the story, Rachel Bade and Nick Miroff, said they had reviewed the "e-mail", the e-mail of a manager from the White House in the report is totally harmless.
"The idea was mentioned by one or two directors who, if they are not able to build enough temporary housing, should be transported by members of the caravan to small and medium-sized sanctuary cities", said May Davis, White House Policy Coordinator, in an email dated November 16, according to the report. "There is no White House decision on this."
That's all. This is one of the so-called scary emails sent by a White House person included in the history of the Post.
Matthew Albence, Acting Deputy Director of ICE, responded to the e-mail suggesting that the transportation of long-distance strangers from the border would be an additional strain on the agency and that the fact of to hurt someone during the trip would pose a liability problem. In a statement to the Post, Albence denied ever being "subjected to pressure from anyone in the White House on the issue", simply "asked my opinion" and considered his advice. A statement from the White House actually says the same thing.
Yet, even if the proposal was conceived as a politically cynical decision, it does not explain why the Democrats would not invite clandestine or undocumented asylum seekers harder in neighborhoods and cities that are supposed to be the most welcoming. Pelosi said Thursday: "Of course, there is room and a need" for more immigrants to come to the border.
Agree, but not in San Francisco!
[ad_2]
Source link