Shroud talks about banning popular Twitch streamers



[ad_1]

Shroud recently explained his position on banning popular streamers. This year, names like xQc and Dr. Disrespect were banned from driving. However, the streamer doesn’t believe getting banned is such a big deal. In Dr’s case, he has a very good point. Getting banned could have been one of the best moves of his career. Fans will remember how people flooded a YouTube feed when they thought it was defecting to the competition. Shroud argues that these wrist slaps are little more than a vacation for the biggest names in the game. Fans have grown accustomed to a mid-size streamer getting caught cheating or some other misstep. low level and pays the price. The difference with someone like xQc is that there are no giants to fall back on when they go wrong.

“Getting banned doesn’t mean anything,” he explained in a video. “Dr. Disrespect was banned for a month for release in a bathroom. He came back stronger than ever… If I was banned, would I really care? Probably not, because getting banned doesn’t really do anything. You take a little vacation and come back swinging.

“It’s weird how banning a big streamer is at best, which basically doesn’t make sense,” he added, then immediately drew attention to the consistencies on the platform. “Twitch can’t really change a person’s ban rules based on their top streamers, that’s not really fair. I’m just glad they keep it consistent.

Recently, the streamer also explained how Assassin’s Creed Valhalla stands as a GOTY candidate.

“Do I think this game could be the game of the year? Absolutely not, ”said Shroud. “The game of the year is awarded to titles which, without offense, really try. You know what I mean? The game developers for this game, don’t get me wrong, they are doing very well. But the direction of the game is to be cash. The direction of the game is not to polish everything, to be perfect, to make sure the lip sync is good, to make sure all the animations are good. They could do it if they wanted to. They really could. It would just take longer. That is not the name of this game. The name of this game is to bring out something fairly quickly that people can spend hundreds of hours on. And that’s all. It’s not the game of the year that deserves. “

Do you agree with his position on bans? Let us know in the comments!

[ad_2]

Source link