Why did the government fail to inform Singaporeans in March that teachers' parking revenues will be donated to individual schools?

I refer to the article "Parliament: charging parking fees to teachers will result in revenues of $ 8 to $ 10 million a year" (Straits Times, July 9). It states that "the estimated incomes of teachers' parking fees will be $ 8 to $ 10 million a year."

As for "Mr. Ong said that the revenues will be retained by the schools.There are 360 ​​primary schools, secondary schools and junior colleges in Singapore" – according to the article "Citizens are not appeased by the revelation that schools get teachers parking fees "(theonlinecitizen, Jul 11) – Singaporeans are unhappy with the latest revelation As some of my friends have said – people may not be so angry now – so why did not they say when the policy change of "parking fees for teachers" was announced in March – that the revenues will be kept by individual schools?

Why is there no mention of this in the article "No Absorption of Parking Fees for Hwa Chong Teachers" (Straits Times, Apr 21 19659008].

Thus, the question is: when was it decided that the revenues would go to individual schools in March or later or only now?

By the way, for the five Polytechnic Institute Institute of Technical Education "These six institutions have they started to pay parking fees?"

Like what my friends said, which can make Singaporeans even more in anger that the "revelation" that the response to Parliament would have undoubtedly ignored the issue of MPs who only paid $ 365 per year to park in a HDB parking lot in Singapore and Parliament.

Is not it an affront to "Parking rates have been imposed The policy of" own wages "of the Divisio n of the public service, which states that wages must be fully accounted for, with no hidden privileges and privileges "