[ad_1]
SINGAPORE – The application of a former student to get his mastery by a court order failed after a judge found the National University of Singapore (NUS) was justified in denying him the graduation.
Judge Woo Bih Li ruled that although Ms. Jeanne-Marie Ten had overcome the academic obstacles to the degree, she should have also met the administrative requirements of the university if they were reasonable
"The refusal of any degree to a candidate who has otherwise met the academic requirements is the C & # 39; is a step not to be taken lightly," said Judge Woo in his 94-page judgment rendered earlier this month.
Ms. Ten, 47, a candidate for the Master of Arts (Architecture) degree in research at the NUS School of Design and Environment from 2002, had asked the NUS for her diploma and damages.
She must have graduated in mid-2005, but her dissatisfaction with the developments which led to the end of her candidacy in September 2006.
She had been notified about six months earlier that her thesis had approved and that it remained for him to submit form RO.85, duly completed and signed, a copy of his application. She did, however, submit a copy of the thesis, but was unable to download it electronically or at all. sign and submit form RO.85 for reasons that have emerged during court proceedings. [[traduction]]
19659002] Judge Woo noted that the form contained various guarantees that NUS had the right to obtain candidates. These required, among other things, that the candidate does not endorse the copyright and that the candidate has fully complied with the NUS guidelines on the integrity of research.
Ms. Ten's lawyer, Christopher Daniel, argued that the clause required him to indemnify NUS If a third party sued NUS for infringing intellectual property, even if it failed, it was too broad to be reasonable. NUS 'lawyer Chia Voon Jiet challenged her claim.
Woo J. argued that, even if she had the right to reject the clause, she would not have submitted the form as a "genuine reason" for refusing to do so. his work would be used by Dr. Wong (his thesis director Wong Yunn Chii) without proper recognition. "
Expressing sympathy for Ms. Ten, the judge said that he hoped the parties would agree" one way or the other ".
A NUS spokesman said yesterday that the NUS had always sought to confer the grade on Ms. Ten but that he could not do so because she did not meet the necessary conditions. as it complies with the applicable requirements set out in the court judgment. "
[ad_2]
Source link
