[ad_1]
SINGAPORE – A conversation in which scathing remarks were made about the Workers' Party president, Sylvia Lim, was secretly recorded by the same person who was whipping.
Ms. How Weng Fan, then deputy secretary of Aljunied-Hougang City Council, recorded her 2016 telephone conversation with a KPMG audit firm leader.
During this phone call, she described Ms. Lim as "hopeless" and said that AHTC would die under her watch. She also accused Ms. Lim of her husband's death in 2015.
Ms. How then recorded the recording as evidence of a multi-million dollar civil suit, including Ms. How and Ms. Lim, brought in civil suits for allegedly incorrect payments made by AHTC to her agent. FM Solutions & Services (FMSS) and its service provider.
Ms. How and her late husband, Danny Loh, both supporters of WP, were the major shareholders of FMSS.
Lawyer David Chan, who represents AHTC, established this chain of events during a brief cross-examination on Tuesday (October 30), day 17 of the trial.
He asked Ms. How if she had recorded the call and provided the registration to the court.
Ms. How answered yes to both counts.
"And you did not say (at the KPMG executive) that the call was recorded, is not it?"
No, she says
During her re-examination, Ms. How also repeated to the court that a letter of intent sent by FMSS to AHTC on June 22 did not confirm that FMSS had already won the contract.
She said that she first needed Ms. Lim's answer, which she received two weeks later.
"While we took the commitment (assuming responsibility and risks as a business), we also needed the commitment on his part … We needed the necessary paperwork to buy He was a bit unsure whether (WP) would always proceed (then), "she said.
ANOTHER SHAREHOLDER OF FMSS TAKES THE STAND
After Ms. How closed, the FMSS shareholder, Yeo Soon Fei, made his appearance. While FMSS was still hired by AHTC, he was also Deputy Director General of the City Council.
On Tuesday, Chan sought to establish that "the entire payment process was controlled by recipients," including Mr. Yeo, Ms. How, and Mr. Loh.
The trio has been involved in signing several stages of the payment process, including work orders, tax invoices and payment vouchers, Chan said.
But Yeo insisted that the ultimate control was exercised by the city council.
"Finally, who is the payer? The city council.They pay us for the work we deliver," he said.
Another problem in the payment process was that a stamp used by Mr. Yeo, intended to certify that the work had been completed, was not accurate, attempted to show Mr. Chan.
Rather, it was used as a means of confirming that monetary sums had been calculated correctly.
Mr. Yeo said that this was not accurate and that there were controls in place, such as an internal system to track whether resident complaints had been handled.
For this, Mr. Chan said that the system was limited in its functions.
After a few trips back and forth, Mr. Yeo confirmed that the stamp should only certify if the numbers counted.
Later, Mr. Chan asked him who was doing the work and services properly.
Mr. Yeo said that the range of duties of a management officer was very broad and that the best ones to ensure that the work was done were the deputies.
That's because they can follow these events through their regular meetings and the complaints management system, he added.
"The deputies saw us working, we worked day and night … I had high blood pressure because of that.It is very stressful.We have so many audits that we have to do a job. everyday, it's not like we're standing there and doing nothing, we can not stay here and let the city council die, I go back every day at 8 or 9 pm, I even go back to the weekend. end, "he said.
Mr. Chan said, "I do not suggest that you do not work hard."
Having no questions to re-examine, Mr. Yeo was arrested before lunch.
The hearing resumes after lunch.
[ad_2]
Source link